Ad is loading...
CCBTX vs FDBTX
CCBTX vs FDBTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCBTX vs. FDBTX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCBTX is a Hold and FDBTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCBTX (4.74B) and FDBTX (4.74B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FDBTX pays higher dividends than CCBTX: FDBTX (3.16) vs CCBTX (1.98). CCBTX was incepted earlier than FDBTX: CCBTX (11 years) vs FDBTX (8 years). CCBTX (1.37) is less costly to investors than FDBTX (0.30). CCBTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FDBTX: CCBTX (250) vs FDBTX (1000000). FDBTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.42 vs. CCBTX (6.23). FDBTX return over 5 years is better than : 21.72 vs. CCBTX (16.38).
| CCBTX | FDBTX | CCBTX / FDBTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.30 | 457% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.30 | 457% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.070 | 2.455 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.74B | 4.74B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.98 | 3.16 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.23 | 7.42 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.99 | 11.94 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.38 | 21.72 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.38 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...