Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCCCX vs MLPRX
CCCCX vs MLPRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCCCX vs. MLPRX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCCCX is a Hold and MLPRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLPRX has more cash in the bank: 3.93B vs. CCCCX (1.08B). MLPRX pays higher dividends than CCCCX: MLPRX (9.05) vs CCCCX (7.59). CCCCX was incepted earlier than MLPRX: CCCCX (15 years) vs MLPRX (14 years). MLPRX (7.31) is less costly to investors than CCCCX (2.24). CCCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. MLPRX (11.00). CCCCX (1000) and MLPRX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CCCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.48 vs. MLPRX (8.82). MLPRX return over 5 years is better than : 243.11 vs. CCCCX (199.10).
| CCCCX | MLPRX | CCCCX / MLPRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.21 | 7.31 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.24 | 7.31 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.265 | 4.079 | 31% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.08B | 3.93B | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.59 | 9.05 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.48 | 8.82 | 198% |
| Returns for 3 years | 78.34 | 76.84 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 199.10 | 243.11 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.05 | 62.67 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement