Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCDVX vs FXAIX
CCDVX vs FXAIX Comparison
Open Charts CCDVX vs FXAIX
Calamos Dividend Growth C
Price$19.14
Change-$0.04 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.8M
CCDVX vs FXAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCDVX vs. FXAIX commentary
Jul 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCDVX is a Buy and FXAIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 666B vs. CCDVX (21.8M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than CCDVX: FXAIX (1.20) vs CCDVX (0.00). CCDVX was incepted earlier than FXAIX: CCDVX (12 years) vs FXAIX (14 years). CCDVX (2.74) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). CCDVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCDVX: FXAIX (0) vs CCDVX (2500). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.28 vs. CCDVX (10.06). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 113.16 vs. CCDVX (54.97).
| CCDVX | FXAIX | CCDVX / FXAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 0.01 | 14,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.74 | 0.01 | 18,267% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.649 | 7.829 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.8M | 666B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.20 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.06 | 14.28 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.74 | 72.52 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.97 | 113.16 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.70 | 228.12 | 36% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement