Ad is loading...
CCDVX vs FXAIX
CCDVX vs FXAIX Comparison
Open Charts CCDVX vs FXAIX
Calamos Dividend Growth C
Price$14.97
Change-$0.20 (-1.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.39M
CCDVX vs FXAIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCDVX vs. FXAIX commentary
Apr 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCDVX is a Hold and FXAIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 598B vs. CCDVX (18.4M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than CCDVX: FXAIX (1.30) vs CCDVX (0.00). CCDVX was incepted earlier than FXAIX: CCDVX (12 years) vs FXAIX (14 years). CCDVX (2.74) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). CCDVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCDVX: FXAIX (0) vs CCDVX (2500). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.40 vs. CCDVX (-7.76). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 95.83 vs. CCDVX (39.47).
| CCDVX | FXAIX | CCDVX / FXAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 0.01 | 14,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.74 | 0.01 | 18,267% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -15.804 | -13.644 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.4M | 598B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.30 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.76 | -1.40 | 556% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.47 | 18.06 | 14% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.47 | 95.83 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.38 | 163.48 | 26% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...