CCFC
Price
$12.15
Change
+$1.35 (+12.50%)
Updated
Mar 6 closing price
Capitalization
12.98M
ERKH
Price
$16.75
Change
-$1.25 (-6.94%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
13.51M
Ad is loading...

CCFC vs ERKH

Header iconCCFC vs ERKH Comparison
Open Charts CCFC vs ERKHBanner chart's image
CCSB Financial
Price$12.15
Change+$1.35 (+12.50%)
Volume$200
Capitalization12.98M
Eureka Homestead Ban
Price$16.75
Change-$1.25 (-6.94%)
Volume$10.93K
Capitalization13.51M
CCFC vs ERKH Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CCFC vs. ERKH commentary
Apr 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCFC is a Hold and ERKH is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 19, 2025
Stock price -- (CCFC: $12.15 vs. ERKH: $16.75)
Brand notoriety: CCFC and ERKH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CCFC: 102% vs. ERKH: 930%
Market capitalization -- CCFC: $12.98M vs. ERKH: $13.51M
CCFC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $12.98M. ERKH’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $13.51M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CCFC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileERKH’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CCFC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ERKH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ERKH is a better buy in the long-term than CCFC.

Price Growth

CCFC (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while ERKH (@Regional Banks) price change was -4.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.79%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ERKH($13.5M) and CCFC($13M) have the same market capitalization . CCFC YTD gains are higher at: 15.166 vs. ERKH (-6.162). CCFC has less debt than ERKH: CCFC (13.4M) vs ERKH (18.2M). CCFC has higher revenues than ERKH: CCFC (3.21M) vs ERKH (2.63M).
CCFCERKHCCFC / ERKH
Capitalization13M13.5M96%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD15.166-6.162-246%
P/E RatioN/A270.27-
Revenue3.21M2.63M122%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt13.4M18.2M74%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CCFC: Fundamental Ratings
CCFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
46
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DFE61.570.71
+1.17%
WisdomTree Europe SmallCap Dividend ETF
BWEB46.470.32
+0.69%
Bitwise Web3 ETF
HYLS40.850.22
+0.54%
First Trust Tactical High Yield ETF
MKOR21.650.05
+0.23%
Matthews Korea Active ETF
PTMC34.660.01
+0.03%
Pacer Trendpilot™ US Mid Cap ETF

CCFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CCFC and CRZBF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCFC and CRZBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCFC
1D Price
Change %
CCFC100%
N/A
CRZBF - CCFC
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MBKL - CCFC
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HRGG - CCFC
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HCKG - CCFC
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ERKH - CCFC
21%
Poorly correlated
-6.94%
More

ERKH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ERKH and HRGG have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ERKH and HRGG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ERKH
1D Price
Change %
ERKH100%
-6.94%
HRGG - ERKH
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WCFB - ERKH
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RCBC - ERKH
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.17%
CRZBF - ERKH
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MBKL - ERKH
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More