Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCFTX vs FSNUX
CCFTX vs FSNUX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCFTX vs. FSNUX commentary
Jul 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCFTX is a Hold and FSNUX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCFTX has more cash in the bank: 51.5B vs. FSNUX (29.3B). FSNUX pays higher dividends than CCFTX: FSNUX (1.79) vs CCFTX (0.90). CCFTX was incepted earlier than FSNUX: CCFTX (11 years) vs FSNUX (8 years). CCFTX (1.40) is less costly to investors than FSNUX (0.59). FSNUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.00 vs. CCFTX (7.00). FSNUX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCFTX: FSNUX (0) vs CCFTX (250). CCFTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.18 vs. FSNUX (8.95). CCFTX return over 5 years is better than : 34.07 vs. FSNUX (29.63).
| CCFTX | FSNUX | CCFTX / FSNUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.59 | 237% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.59 | 237% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.184 | 7.469 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.5B | 29.3B | 176% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 1.79 | 50% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.18 | 8.95 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.42 | 38.17 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.07 | 29.63 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.83 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers