Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGCX vs FCVSX
CCGCX vs FCVSX Comparison
Open Charts CCGCX vs FCVSX
Calamos Global Convertible C
Price$12.64
Change+$0.02 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets143.82M
Fidelity Convertible Securities
Price$36.86
Change+$0.18 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.88B
CCGCX vs FCVSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGCX vs. FCVSX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGCX is a Hold and FCVSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCVSX has more cash in the bank: 1.88B vs. CCGCX (144M). FCVSX pays higher dividends than CCGCX: FCVSX (3.21) vs CCGCX (0.00). CCGCX was incepted earlier than FCVSX: CCGCX (11 years) vs FCVSX (39 years). CCGCX (2.10) is less costly to investors than FCVSX (0.69). FCVSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. CCGCX (40.00). FCVSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGCX: FCVSX (0) vs CCGCX (2500). CCGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.76 vs. FCVSX (10.91). FCVSX return over 5 years is better than : 20.62 vs. CCGCX (-0.08).
| CCGCX | FCVSX | CCGCX / FCVSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 0.69 | 304% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 0.69 | 304% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.437 | 8.266 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 2500 | - |
| Net Assets | 144M | 1.88B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 3.21 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.76 | 10.91 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.19 | 35.32 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.08 | 20.62 | -0% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.28 | 47.78 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement