Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGIX vs FNPFX
CCGIX vs FNPFX Comparison
Open Charts CCGIX vs FNPFX
Baird Chautauqua Global Growth Instl
Price$26.08
Change+$0.15 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets411.9M
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$70.44
Change+$0.44 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets155.52B
CCGIX vs FNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGIX vs. FNPFX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGIX is a Buy and FNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 156B vs. CCGIX (412M). FNPFX pays higher dividends than CCGIX: FNPFX (0.79) vs CCGIX (0.27). CCGIX was incepted earlier than FNPFX: CCGIX (9 years) vs FNPFX (8 years). CCGIX (0.86) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.41). FNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. CCGIX (15.00). CCGIX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: CCGIX (10000) vs FNPFX (1000000). FNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.06 vs. CCGIX (9.41). CCGIX return over 5 years is better than : 63.03 vs. FNPFX (42.55).
| CCGIX | FNPFX | CCGIX / FNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.41 | 195% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.41 | 210% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.733 | 13.430 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 1000000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 412M | 156B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.27 | 0.79 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.41 | 12.06 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.68 | 47.66 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.03 | 42.55 | 148% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement