Ad is loading...
CCGIX vs FNPFX
CCGIX vs FNPFX Comparison
Open Charts CCGIX vs FNPFX
Baird Chautauqua Global Growth Instl
Price$22.62
Change+$1.54 (+7.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets333.25M
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$58.70
Change+$4.29 (+7.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets122.54B
CCGIX vs FNPFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGIX vs. FNPFX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGIX is a Buy and FNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 123B vs. CCGIX (333M). FNPFX pays higher dividends than CCGIX: FNPFX (0.90) vs CCGIX (0.29). CCGIX was incepted earlier than FNPFX: CCGIX (9 years) vs FNPFX (8 years). CCGIX (0.88) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.41). FNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. CCGIX (14.00). CCGIX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: CCGIX (10000) vs FNPFX (1000000). CCGIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.16 vs. FNPFX (-9.42). CCGIX return over 5 years is better than : 65.04 vs. FNPFX (37.25).
| CCGIX | FNPFX | CCGIX / FNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.41 | 195% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.41 | 215% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.791 | -12.383 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 1000000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 333M | 123B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.90 | 32% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.16 | -9.42 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.30 | -5.21 | -121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.04 | 37.25 | 175% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...