Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGIX vs FNPFX
CCGIX vs FNPFX Comparison
Open Charts CCGIX vs FNPFX
Baird Chautauqua Global Growth Instl
Price$25.59
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets405.24M
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$67.32
Change-$0.26 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets150.13B
CCGIX vs FNPFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGIX vs. FNPFX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGIX is a Buy and FNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 150B vs. CCGIX (405M). FNPFX pays higher dividends than CCGIX: FNPFX (0.82) vs CCGIX (0.27). CCGIX was incepted earlier than FNPFX: CCGIX (9 years) vs FNPFX (8 years). CCGIX (0.86) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.41). FNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. CCGIX (15.00). CCGIX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: CCGIX (10000) vs FNPFX (1000000). FNPFX (9.63) and CCGIX (9.21) have marching annual gain over last year. CCGIX return over 5 years is better than : 67.64 vs. FNPFX (45.23).
| CCGIX | FNPFX | CCGIX / FNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.41 | 195% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.41 | 210% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.295 | 8.824 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 1000000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 405M | 150B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.27 | 0.82 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.21 | 9.63 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.46 | 30.25 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.64 | 45.23 | 150% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement