Ad is loading...
CCGRX vs GFAFX
CCGRX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts CCGRX vs GFAFX
Columbia Large Cap Growth Adv
Price$78.06
Change-$0.16 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$76.19
Change-$0.14 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGRX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
CCGRX vs. GFAFX commentary
Sep 21, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGRX is a Buy and GFAFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 290B vs. CCGRX (5.82B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than CCGRX: GFAFX (0.45) vs CCGRX (0.00). CCGRX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: CCGRX (12 years) vs GFAFX (24 years). CCGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. GFAFX (31.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGRX: GFAFX (250) vs CCGRX (2000). CCGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.77 vs. GFAFX (23.62). CCGRX return over 5 years is better than : 65.82 vs. GFAFX (50.55).
| CCGRX | GFAFX | CCGRX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.226 | 19.278 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.82B | 290B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.45 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.77 | 23.62 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.98 | -3.34 | -299% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.82 | 50.55 | 130% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.21 | 62.13 | 165% |