Ad is loading...
CCGSX vs FNFPX
CCGSX vs FNFPX Comparison
Open Charts CCGSX vs FNFPX
Baird Chautauqua Global Growth I
Price$22.33
Change+$1.52 (+7.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets333.25M
American Funds New Perspective 529-F-3
Price$58.51
Change+$4.27 (+7.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets122.54B
CCGSX vs FNFPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNFPX has more cash in the bank: 123B vs. CCGSX (333M). FNFPX pays higher dividends than CCGSX: FNFPX (0.85) vs CCGSX (0.17). CCGSX was incepted earlier than FNFPX: CCGSX (9 years) vs FNFPX (4 years). CCGSX (1.13) is less costly to investors than FNFPX (0.47). FNFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. CCGSX (14.00). FNFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGSX: FNFPX (250) vs CCGSX (2500). CCGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.43 vs. FNFPX (-9.47).
| CCGSX | FNFPX | CCGSX / FNFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.47 | 223% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.47 | 240% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.840 | -12.389 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 333M | 123B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.17 | 0.85 | 21% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.43 | -9.47 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.52 | -4.33 | -127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.85 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...