Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGSX vs FNPFX
CCGSX vs FNPFX Comparison
Open Charts CCGSX vs FNPFX
Baird Chautauqua Global Growth I
Price$25.25
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets405.84M
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$67.32
Change-$0.26 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets150.71B
CCGSX vs FNPFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGSX vs. FNPFX commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGSX is a Buy and FNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 151B vs. CCGSX (406M). FNPFX pays higher dividends than CCGSX: FNPFX (0.82) vs CCGSX (0.16). CCGSX was incepted earlier than FNPFX: CCGSX (9 years) vs FNPFX (8 years). CCGSX (1.11) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.41). FNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. CCGSX (15.00). CCGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: CCGSX (2500) vs FNPFX (1000000). FNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.63 vs. CCGSX (8.89). CCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 65.41 vs. FNPFX (45.23).
| CCGSX | FNPFX | CCGSX / FNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.41 | 256% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.41 | 271% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.183 | 8.824 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 406M | 151B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 0.82 | 20% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.89 | 9.63 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.31 | 30.25 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.41 | 45.23 | 145% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement