Ad is loading...
Ad is loading...
CCGSX vs FNPFX
CCGSX vs FNPFX Comparison
Open Charts CCGSX vs FNPFX
Baird Chautauqua Global Growth I
Price$23.93
Change-$0.37 (-1.52%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$64.73
Change-$0.93 (-1.42%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
CCGSX vs FNPFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGSX vs. FNPFX commentary
Nov 18, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGSX is a StrongBuy and FNPFX is a StrongSell.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 142B vs. CCGSX (374M). FNPFX pays higher dividends than CCGSX: FNPFX (1.11) vs CCGSX (0.16). CCGSX was incepted earlier than FNPFX: CCGSX (9 years) vs FNPFX (8 years). FNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. CCGSX (14.00). CCGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: CCGSX (2500) vs FNPFX (1000000). CCGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.18 vs. FNPFX (18.53). CCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 71.81 vs. FNPFX (40.52).
| CCGSX | FNPFX | CCGSX / FNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.074 | 15.796 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 374M | 142B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 1.11 | 14% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.18 | 18.53 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.05 | -9.40 | -43% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.81 | 40.52 | 177% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |