Ad is loading...
CCGSX vs FNPFX
CCGSX vs FNPFX Comparison
Open Charts CCGSX vs FNPFX
Baird Chautauqua Global Growth I
Price$23.48
Change+$0.43 (+1.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets370.16M
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$61.16
Change+$1.16 (+1.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.95B
CCGSX vs FNPFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGSX vs. FNPFX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGSX is a Buy and FNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. CCGSX (370M). FNPFX pays higher dividends than CCGSX: FNPFX (0.90) vs CCGSX (0.17). CCGSX was incepted earlier than FNPFX: CCGSX (9 years) vs FNPFX (8 years). CCGSX (1.13) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.41). FNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. CCGSX (14.00). CCGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: CCGSX (2500) vs FNPFX (1000000). CCGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.85 vs. FNPFX (4.64). CCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 72.49 vs. FNPFX (49.33).
| CCGSX | FNPFX | CCGSX / FNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.41 | 256% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.41 | 276% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.243 | -1.514 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 370M | 135B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.17 | 0.90 | 20% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.85 | 4.64 | 148% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.56 | 12.34 | 191% |
| Returns for 5 years | 72.49 | 49.33 | 147% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...