Ad is loading...
CCGSX vs FNPFX
CCGSX vs FNPFX Comparison
Open Charts CCGSX vs FNPFX
Baird Chautauqua Global Growth I
Price$22.85
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$61.81
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGSX vs FNPFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
CCGSX vs. FNPFX commentary
Sep 16, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGSX is a Buy and FNPFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 142B vs. CCGSX (374M). FNPFX pays higher dividends than CCGSX: FNPFX (1.11) vs CCGSX (0.16). CCGSX was incepted earlier than FNPFX: CCGSX (8 years) vs FNPFX (8 years). FNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. CCGSX (14.00). CCGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: CCGSX (2500) vs FNPFX (1000000). CCGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.90 vs. FNPFX (17.25). CCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 76.92 vs. FNPFX (44.53).
| CCGSX | FNPFX | CCGSX / FNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.389 | 14.937 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 374M | 142B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 1.11 | 14% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.90 | 17.25 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.63 | -6.29 | -90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 76.92 | 44.53 | 173% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...