Ad is loading...
CCGSX vs FNPFX
CCGSX vs FNPFX Comparison
Open Charts CCGSX vs FNPFX
Baird Chautauqua Global Growth I
Price$24.97
Change-$0.19 (-0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets393.22M
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$65.00
Change-$0.79 (-1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.51B
CCGSX vs FNPFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGSX vs. FNPFX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGSX is a StrongBuy and FNPFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. CCGSX (393M). FNPFX pays higher dividends than CCGSX: FNPFX (1.11) vs CCGSX (0.16). CCGSX was incepted earlier than FNPFX: CCGSX (9 years) vs FNPFX (8 years). FNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. CCGSX (14.00). CCGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: CCGSX (2500) vs FNPFX (1000000). CCGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.38 vs. FNPFX (10.81). CCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 67.26 vs. FNPFX (35.63).
| CCGSX | FNPFX | CCGSX / FNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.984 | 4.670 | 150% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 393M | 148B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 1.11 | 14% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.38 | 10.81 | 142% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.91 | 15.29 | 169% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.26 | 35.63 | 189% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers