Ad is loading...
CCGSX vs RNPBX
CCGSX vs RNPBX Comparison
Open Charts CCGSX vs RNPBX
Baird Chautauqua Global Growth I
Price$24.05
Change+$0.03 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets386.04M
American Funds New Perspective R2
Price$58.96
Change+$0.13 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets141.81B
CCGSX vs RNPBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGSX vs. RNPBX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGSX is a Buy and RNPBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPBX has more cash in the bank: 142B vs. CCGSX (386M). CCGSX pays higher dividends than RNPBX: CCGSX (0.17) vs RNPBX (0.00). CCGSX was incepted earlier than RNPBX: CCGSX (9 years) vs RNPBX (23 years). RNPBX (1.50) is less costly to investors than CCGSX (1.13). RNPBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. CCGSX (15.00). RNPBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGSX: RNPBX (250) vs CCGSX (2500). CCGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.95 vs. RNPBX (4.31). CCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 73.69 vs. RNPBX (40.26).
| CCGSX | RNPBX | CCGSX / RNPBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.50 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 1.50 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.913 | 1.606 | 181% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 386M | 142B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.17 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.95 | 4.31 | 185% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.54 | 19.98 | 213% |
| Returns for 5 years | 73.69 | 40.26 | 183% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 54.64 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...