Ad is loading...
CCGSX vs RNPEX
CCGSX vs RNPEX Comparison
Open Charts CCGSX vs RNPEX
Baird Chautauqua Global Growth I
Price$24.05
Change+$0.03 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets386.04M
American Funds New Perspective R4
Price$62.18
Change+$0.13 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets141.81B
CCGSX vs RNPEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGSX vs. RNPEX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGSX is a Buy and RNPEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPEX has more cash in the bank: 142B vs. CCGSX (386M). RNPEX pays higher dividends than CCGSX: RNPEX (0.55) vs CCGSX (0.17). CCGSX was incepted earlier than RNPEX: CCGSX (9 years) vs RNPEX (23 years). CCGSX (1.13) is less costly to investors than RNPEX (0.76). RNPEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. CCGSX (15.00). RNPEX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGSX: RNPEX (250) vs CCGSX (2500). CCGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.94 vs. RNPEX (5.33). CCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 73.98 vs. RNPEX (45.80).
| CCGSX | RNPEX | CCGSX / RNPEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.76 | 138% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.76 | 149% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.085 | 1.872 | 165% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 386M | 142B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.17 | 0.55 | 32% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.94 | 5.33 | 149% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.64 | 22.46 | 163% |
| Returns for 5 years | 73.98 | 45.80 | 162% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 62.21 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...