Ad is loading...
CCGSX vs RNPGX
CCGSX vs RNPGX Comparison
Open Charts CCGSX vs RNPGX
Baird Chautauqua Global Growth I
Price$22.85
Change-$0.46 (-1.97%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds New Perspective R6
Price$61.85
Change-$1.09 (-1.73%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGSX vs RNPGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
CCGSX vs. RNPGX commentary
Sep 08, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGSX is a Buy and RNPGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPGX has more cash in the bank: 137B vs. CCGSX (359M). RNPGX pays higher dividends than CCGSX: RNPGX (1.11) vs CCGSX (0.16). CCGSX was incepted earlier than RNPGX: CCGSX (8 years) vs RNPGX (15 years). RNPGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. CCGSX (14.00). RNPGX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGSX: RNPGX (250) vs CCGSX (2500). CCGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.17 vs. RNPGX (15.28). CCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 74.76 vs. RNPGX (42.05).
| CCGSX | RNPGX | CCGSX / RNPGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.041 | 12.534 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 359M | 137B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 1.11 | 14% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.17 | 15.28 | 132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.10 | -9.22 | -23% |
| Returns for 5 years | 74.76 | 42.05 | 178% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 65.62 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...