Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGTX vs FCGTX
CCGTX vs FCGTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGTX vs. FCGTX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGTX is a Hold and FCGTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCGTX (46.4B) and FCGTX (46.4B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FCGTX pays higher dividends than CCGTX: FCGTX (1.51) vs CCGTX (0.53). CCGTX was incepted earlier than FCGTX: CCGTX (11 years) vs FCGTX (8 years). CCGTX (1.42) is less costly to investors than FCGTX (0.36). CCGTX (6.00) and FCGTX (6.00) have comparable annual turnover. CCGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGTX: CCGTX (250) vs FCGTX (1000000). FCGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.95 vs. CCGTX (9.71). FCGTX return over 5 years is better than : 41.53 vs. CCGTX (35.98).
| CCGTX | FCGTX | CCGTX / FCGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 0.36 | 394% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 0.36 | 394% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.372 | 6.892 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 46.4B | 46.4B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 1.51 | 35% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.71 | 10.95 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.87 | 25.92 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.98 | 41.53 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.60 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers