Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGTX vs FSNVX
CCGTX vs FSNVX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGTX vs. FSNVX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGTX is a Hold and FSNVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCGTX has more cash in the bank: 47.1B vs. FSNVX (29B). FSNVX pays higher dividends than CCGTX: FSNVX (1.49) vs CCGTX (0.53). CCGTX was incepted earlier than FSNVX: CCGTX (11 years) vs FSNVX (8 years). CCGTX (1.42) is less costly to investors than FSNVX (0.63). FSNVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. CCGTX (6.00). FSNVX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGTX: FSNVX (0) vs CCGTX (250). CCGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.98 vs. FSNVX (8.48). CCGTX return over 5 years is better than : 40.90 vs. FSNVX (38.04).
| CCGTX | FSNVX | CCGTX / FSNVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 0.63 | 225% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 0.63 | 225% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.322 | 5.796 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 47.1B | 29B | 162% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 1.49 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.98 | 8.48 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.67 | 42.53 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.90 | 38.04 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.43 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement