Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGTX vs MLFIX
CCGTX vs MLFIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGTX vs. MLFIX commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGTX is a Hold and MLFIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCGTX has more cash in the bank: 46.2B vs. MLFIX (796M). MLFIX pays higher dividends than CCGTX: MLFIX (2.73) vs CCGTX (0.53). CCGTX was incepted earlier than MLFIX: CCGTX (11 years) vs MLFIX (20 years). CCGTX (1.42) is less costly to investors than MLFIX (0.76). MLFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 9.00 vs. CCGTX (6.00). MLFIX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGTX: MLFIX (0) vs CCGTX (250). CCGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.71 vs. MLFIX (8.16). MLFIX return over 5 years is better than : 40.92 vs. CCGTX (35.53).
| CCGTX | MLFIX | CCGTX / MLFIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 0.56 | 254% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 0.76 | 187% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.021 | 5.201 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 46.2B | 796M | 5,804% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 2.73 | 20% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.71 | 8.16 | 131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.60 | 18.96 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.53 | 40.92 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.21 | 66.45 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement