Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGTX vs TLZIX
CCGTX vs TLZIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGTX vs. TLZIX commentary
Aug 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGTX is a Hold and TLZIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCGTX has more cash in the bank: 48.7B vs. TLZIX (11B). TLZIX pays higher dividends than CCGTX: TLZIX (2.10) vs CCGTX (0.51). CCGTX was incepted earlier than TLZIX: CCGTX (12 years) vs TLZIX (16 years). CCGTX (1.42) is less costly to investors than TLZIX (0.17). TLZIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 12.00 vs. CCGTX (6.00). CCGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than TLZIX: CCGTX (250) vs TLZIX (1000000). TLZIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.23 vs. CCGTX (10.60). TLZIX return over 5 years is better than : 54.72 vs. CCGTX (33.58).
| CCGTX | TLZIX | CCGTX / TLZIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 0.10 | 1,420% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 0.17 | 835% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.092 | 12.944 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 48.7B | 11B | 443% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 2.10 | 24% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.60 | 13.23 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.72 | 45.56 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.58 | 54.72 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.34 | 133.89 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers