CCIA
Price
$25.78
Change
-$0.23 (-0.88%)
Updated
Feb 28 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
EICB
Price
$25.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Feb 28 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Ad is loading...

CCIA vs EICB

Header iconCCIA vs EICB Comparison
Open Charts CCIA vs EICBBanner chart's image
Carlyle Credit Income Fund
Price$25.78
Change-$0.23 (-0.88%)
Volume$1.46K
CapitalizationN/A
Eagle Point Income
Price$25.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$9.59K
CapitalizationN/A
CCIA vs EICB Comparison Chart
Loading...
EICB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CCIA vs. EICB commentary
Mar 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCIA is a Buy and EICB is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Mar 03, 2025
Stock price -- (CCIA: $25.78 vs. EICB: $25.00)
Brand notoriety: CCIA and EICB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CCIA: 25% vs. EICB: 147%
Market capitalization -- CCIA: $0 vs. EICB: $0
CCIA [@Investment Managers] is valued at $0. EICB’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CCIA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileEICB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CCIA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • EICB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CCIA and EICB are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EICB’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • EICB’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

CCIA (@Investment Managers) experienced а -0.85% price change this week, while EICB (@Investment Managers) price change was +0.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.83%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-1.01% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EICB (1.419) and CCIA (1.404) have similar YTD gains . EICB has higher revenues than CCIA: EICB (33.1M) vs CCIA (-6.66M).
CCIAEICBCCIA / EICB
CapitalizationN/AN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD1.4041.41999%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue-6.66M33.1M-20%
Total Cash2.24MN/A-
Total Debt3.48MN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EICB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
10%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
7%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
N/A
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
EICB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GLERX14.240.36
+2.59%
GS Energy Infrastructure Fd R Shares
SXPAX48.590.76
+1.59%
DWS S&P 500 Index A
PMYTX43.680.65
+1.51%
Putnam Core Equity Fund R6
NESGX17.320.11
+0.64%
Needham Small Cap Growth Retail
UBPSX12.18-0.30
-2.40%
ProFunds UltraLatin America Svc

CCIA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CCIA has been closely correlated with OXLCP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CCIA jumps, then OXLCP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCIA
1D Price
Change %
CCIA100%
-0.88%
OXLCP - CCIA
66%
Closely correlated
+0.17%
EICB - CCIA
64%
Loosely correlated
N/A
OCCIN - CCIA
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.04%
EICA - CCIA
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.03%
OXLCN - CCIA
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.23%
More

EICB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EICB has been closely correlated with OXLCP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EICB jumps, then OXLCP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EICB
1D Price
Change %
EICB100%
N/A
OXLCP - EICB
71%
Closely correlated
+0.17%
OCCIN - EICB
68%
Closely correlated
-0.04%
CCIA - EICB
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.88%
OXLCO - EICB
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.04%
EICA - EICB
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.03%
More