Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCIZX vs CMTFX
CCIZX vs CMTFX Comparison
Open Charts CCIZX vs CMTFX
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info Inst
Price$145.96
Change+$1.79 (+1.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.42B
Columbia Global Technology Growth Inst
Price$94.56
Change+$0.74 (+0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.66B
CCIZX vs CMTFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCIZX vs. CMTFX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCIZX is a Buy and CMTFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCIZX has more cash in the bank: 13.4B vs. CMTFX (3.66B). CCIZX (0.00) and CMTFX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCIZX was incepted earlier than CMTFX: CCIZX (15 years) vs CMTFX (25 years). CCIZX (0.93) and CMTFX (0.92) have similar cost to investors . CCIZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. CMTFX (7.00). CCIZX (2000) and CMTFX (2000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CMTFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.37 vs. CCIZX (-3.07). CMTFX return over 5 years is better than : 104.40 vs. CCIZX (53.76).
| CCIZX | CMTFX | CCIZX / CMTFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.92 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.92 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.778 | 2.513 | -111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.4B | 3.66B | 366% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.07 | 11.37 | -27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.20 | 68.71 | 28% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.76 | 104.40 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 117.65 | 371.93 | 32% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement