Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCIZX vs CMTFX
CCIZX vs CMTFX Comparison
Open Charts CCIZX vs CMTFX
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info Inst
Price$157.20
Change-$1.41 (-0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.56B
Columbia Global Technology Growth Inst
Price$100.93
Change-$0.38 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.93B
CCIZX vs CMTFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCIZX vs. CMTFX commentary
Jul 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCIZX is a Buy and CMTFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCIZX has more cash in the bank: 14.6B vs. CMTFX (3.93B). CCIZX (0.00) and CMTFX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCIZX was incepted earlier than CMTFX: CCIZX (15 years) vs CMTFX (25 years). CCIZX (0.93) and CMTFX (0.92) have similar cost to investors . CCIZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. CMTFX (7.00). CCIZX (2000) and CMTFX (2000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CMTFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.09 vs. CCIZX (0.99). CMTFX return over 5 years is better than : 101.62 vs. CCIZX (61.63).
| CCIZX | CMTFX | CCIZX / CMTFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.92 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.92 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.008 | 10.282 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.6B | 3.93B | 372% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.99 | 12.09 | 8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.06 | 103.45 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.63 | 101.62 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 141.47 | 405.91 | 35% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers