Ad is loading...
CCIZX vs DRGTX
CCIZX vs DRGTX Comparison
Open Charts CCIZX vs DRGTX
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info Inst
Price$125.74
Change+$4.44 (+3.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.36B
Virtus Zevenbergen Technology Inst
Price$78.06
Change+$3.16 (+4.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.22B
CCIZX vs DRGTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCIZX vs. DRGTX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCIZX is a Buy and DRGTX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCIZX has more cash in the bank: 11.4B vs. DRGTX (1.22B). CCIZX (0.00) and DRGTX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCIZX was incepted earlier than DRGTX: CCIZX (15 years) vs DRGTX (29 years). DRGTX (1.16) is less costly to investors than CCIZX (0.93). CCIZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. DRGTX (23.00). CCIZX has a lower initial minimum investment than DRGTX: CCIZX (2000) vs DRGTX (1000000). DRGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.47 vs. CCIZX (-10.23). CCIZX return over 5 years is better than : 53.41 vs. DRGTX (7.20).
| CCIZX | DRGTX | CCIZX / DRGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.16 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.16 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -18.201 | -19.836 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.4B | 1.22B | 932% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.23 | -0.47 | 2,188% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.62 | 14.06 | -4% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.41 | 7.20 | 742% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.82 | 14.71 | 631% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...