Ad is loading...
CCIZX vs FADTX
CCIZX vs FADTX Comparison
Open Charts CCIZX vs FADTX
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info Inst
Price$118.23
Change-$1.14 (-0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.09B
Fidelity Advisor Technology A
Price$94.90
Change-$0.60 (-0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.15B
CCIZX vs FADTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCIZX vs. FADTX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCIZX is a Buy and FADTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCIZX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. FADTX (6.15B). CCIZX (0.00) and FADTX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCIZX was incepted earlier than FADTX: CCIZX (15 years) vs FADTX (29 years). CCIZX (0.93) and FADTX (0.93) have similar cost to investors . CCIZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. FADTX (34.00). FADTX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCIZX: FADTX (0) vs CCIZX (2000). FADTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.81 vs. CCIZX (-11.52). FADTX return over 5 years is better than : 64.71 vs. CCIZX (49.55).
| CCIZX | FADTX | CCIZX / FADTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.93 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.93 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -19.502 | -19.943 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 6.15B | 181% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.52 | -6.81 | 169% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.23 | 17.50 | -18% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.55 | 64.71 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.17 | 157.07 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...