Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCIZX vs FADTX
CCIZX vs FADTX Comparison
Open Charts CCIZX vs FADTX
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info Inst
Price$145.53
Change-$2.79 (-1.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.79B
Fidelity Advisor Technology A
Price$119.04
Change-$2.19 (-1.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.83B
CCIZX vs FADTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCIZX vs. FADTX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCIZX is a Buy and FADTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCIZX has more cash in the bank: 13.8B vs. FADTX (6.83B). CCIZX (0.00) and FADTX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCIZX was incepted earlier than FADTX: CCIZX (15 years) vs FADTX (29 years). CCIZX (0.93) and FADTX (0.93) have similar cost to investors . CCIZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. FADTX (34.00). FADTX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCIZX: FADTX (0) vs CCIZX (2000). FADTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.37 vs. CCIZX (-2.93). FADTX return over 5 years is better than : 81.95 vs. CCIZX (66.32).
| CCIZX | FADTX | CCIZX / FADTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.93 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.93 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.020 | 1.626 | 1% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.8B | 6.83B | 202% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.93 | 1.37 | -214% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.65 | 82.69 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.32 | 81.95 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 121.34 | 220.80 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement