Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCIZX vs FATEX
CCIZX vs FATEX Comparison
Open Charts CCIZX vs FATEX
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info Inst
Price$145.96
Change+$1.79 (+1.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.42B
Fidelity Advisor Technology M
Price$107.90
Change+$1.32 (+1.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.83B
CCIZX vs FATEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCIZX vs. FATEX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCIZX is a Buy and FATEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCIZX has more cash in the bank: 13.4B vs. FATEX (6.83B). CCIZX (0.00) and FATEX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCIZX was incepted earlier than FATEX: CCIZX (15 years) vs FATEX (29 years). FATEX (1.18) is less costly to investors than CCIZX (0.93). CCIZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. FATEX (34.00). FATEX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCIZX: FATEX (0) vs CCIZX (2000). FATEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.62 vs. CCIZX (-3.07). FATEX return over 5 years is better than : 68.93 vs. CCIZX (53.76).
| CCIZX | FATEX | CCIZX / FATEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.18 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.18 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.778 | -0.764 | 364% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.4B | 6.83B | 196% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.07 | 2.62 | -117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.20 | 54.53 | 35% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.76 | 68.93 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 117.65 | 196.14 | 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement