Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCIZX vs FATEX
CCIZX vs FATEX Comparison
Open Charts CCIZX vs FATEX
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info Inst
Price$157.73
Change+$0.26 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.57B
Fidelity Advisor Technology M
Price$117.49
Change+$0.07 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.6B
CCIZX vs FATEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCIZX vs. FATEX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCIZX is a Buy and FATEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCIZX has more cash in the bank: 14.6B vs. FATEX (7.6B). CCIZX (0.00) and FATEX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCIZX was incepted earlier than FATEX: CCIZX (15 years) vs FATEX (29 years). FATEX (1.18) is less costly to investors than CCIZX (0.93). CCIZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. FATEX (34.00). FATEX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCIZX: FATEX (0) vs CCIZX (2000). FATEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.92 vs. CCIZX (-0.84). FATEX return over 5 years is better than : 72.40 vs. CCIZX (62.02).
| CCIZX | FATEX | CCIZX / FATEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.18 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.18 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.191 | 9.330 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.6B | 7.6B | 192% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.84 | 3.92 | -22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.00 | 84.33 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.02 | 72.40 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 142.78 | 222.94 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers