Ad is loading...
CCIZX vs FIKGX
CCIZX vs FIKGX Comparison
Open Charts CCIZX vs FIKGX
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info Inst
Price$121.30
Change+$3.23 (+2.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.06B
Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Z
Price$68.93
Change+$2.75 (+4.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.45B
CCIZX vs FIKGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCIZX vs. FIKGX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCIZX is a Buy and FIKGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCIZX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. FIKGX (2.45B). CCIZX (0.00) and FIKGX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCIZX was incepted earlier than FIKGX: CCIZX (15 years) vs FIKGX (7 years). CCIZX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FIKGX (0.58). CCIZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. FIKGX (30.00). FIKGX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCIZX: FIKGX (0) vs CCIZX (2000). CCIZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -12.22 vs. FIKGX (-14.22). FIKGX return over 5 years is better than : 157.00 vs. CCIZX (49.32).
| CCIZX | FIKGX | CCIZX / FIKGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.58 | 160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.58 | 160% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -20.379 | -26.196 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 2.45B | 453% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.22 | -14.22 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.45 | 47.39 | -3% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.32 | 157.00 | 31% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.35 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...