Ad is loading...
CCIZX vs NWHOX
CCIZX vs NWHOX Comparison
Open Charts CCIZX vs NWHOX
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info Inst
Price$148.73
Change-$5.51 (-3.57%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Nationwide Bailard Tech & Sci A
Price$30.55
Change-$1.14 (-3.60%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
CCIZX vs NWHOX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCIZX vs. NWHOX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCIZX is a StrongBuy and NWHOX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCIZX has more cash in the bank: 14.7B vs. NWHOX (202M). CCIZX (0.00) and NWHOX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCIZX was incepted earlier than NWHOX: CCIZX (14 years) vs NWHOX (19 years). NWHOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.71 vs. CCIZX (13.00). CCIZX (2000) and NWHOX (2000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NWHOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.47 vs. CCIZX (18.54). CCIZX return over 5 years is better than : 73.99 vs. NWHOX (49.06).
| CCIZX | NWHOX | CCIZX / NWHOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.146 | 33.151 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.7B | 202M | 7,277% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.54 | 24.47 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.41 | -3.09 | -305% |
| Returns for 5 years | 73.99 | 49.06 | 151% |
| Returns for 10 years | 159.71 | 94.95 | 168% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...