Ad is loading...
CCIZX vs NWHOX
CCIZX vs NWHOX Comparison
Open Charts CCIZX vs NWHOX
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info Inst
Price$121.56
Change-$10.01 (-7.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.4B
Nationwide Bailard Tech & Sci A
Price$22.65
Change-$1.74 (-7.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets164.66M
CCIZX vs NWHOX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCIZX vs. NWHOX commentary
Apr 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCIZX is a Hold and NWHOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCIZX has more cash in the bank: 12.4B vs. NWHOX (165M). CCIZX (0.00) and NWHOX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCIZX was incepted earlier than NWHOX: CCIZX (15 years) vs NWHOX (19 years). NWHOX (1.20) is less costly to investors than CCIZX (0.93). CCIZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. NWHOX (20.38). CCIZX (2000) and NWHOX (2000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CCIZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.40 vs. NWHOX (-11.76). CCIZX return over 5 years is better than : 93.49 vs. NWHOX (37.56).
| CCIZX | NWHOX | CCIZX / NWHOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.20 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.20 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.275 | -7.262 | 155% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.4B | 165M | 7,515% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.40 | -11.76 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.83 | -2.05 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 93.49 | 37.56 | 249% |
| Returns for 10 years | 112.14 | 47.53 | 236% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers