Ad is loading...
CCIZX vs NWHTX
CCIZX vs NWHTX Comparison
Open Charts CCIZX vs NWHTX
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info Inst
Price$118.23
Change-$1.14 (-0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.09B
Nationwide Bailard Tech & Sci R6
Price$25.56
Change-$0.11 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets151.41M
CCIZX vs NWHTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCIZX vs. NWHTX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCIZX is a Buy and NWHTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCIZX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. NWHTX (151M). CCIZX (0.00) and NWHTX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCIZX was incepted earlier than NWHTX: CCIZX (15 years) vs NWHTX (12 years). CCIZX (0.93) is less costly to investors than NWHTX (0.88). CCIZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. NWHTX (20.38). CCIZX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWHTX: CCIZX (2000) vs NWHTX (1000000). CCIZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -12.36 vs. NWHTX (-14.08). CCIZX return over 5 years is better than : 48.12 vs. NWHTX (16.13).
| CCIZX | NWHTX | CCIZX / NWHTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.88 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.88 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -20.271 | -14.601 | 139% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 151M | 7,351% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.36 | -14.08 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.16 | 4.45 | -93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.12 | 16.13 | 298% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.35 | 45.99 | 192% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...