Ad is loading...
CCIZX vs NWHTX
CCIZX vs NWHTX Comparison
Open Charts CCIZX vs NWHTX
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info Inst
Price$133.18
Change-$0.69 (-0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.67B
Nationwide Bailard Tech & Sci R6
Price$27.40
Change+$0.09 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets163.2M
CCIZX vs NWHTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCIZX vs. NWHTX commentary
Mar 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCIZX is a Hold and NWHTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCIZX has more cash in the bank: 12.7B vs. NWHTX (163M). CCIZX (0.00) and NWHTX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCIZX was incepted earlier than NWHTX: CCIZX (14 years) vs NWHTX (11 years). CCIZX (0.93) is less costly to investors than NWHTX (0.88). CCIZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. NWHTX (20.38). CCIZX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWHTX: CCIZX (2000) vs NWHTX (1000000). CCIZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.22 vs. NWHTX (-10.28). CCIZX return over 5 years is better than : 98.89 vs. NWHTX (49.32).
| CCIZX | NWHTX | CCIZX / NWHTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.88 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.88 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.724 | -8.754 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.7B | 163M | 7,791% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.22 | -10.28 | 31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.75 | 14.46 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 98.89 | 49.32 | 201% |
| Returns for 10 years | 115.71 | 58.79 | 197% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...