Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCIZX vs NWHTX
CCIZX vs NWHTX Comparison
Open Charts CCIZX vs NWHTX
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info Inst
Price$142.92
Change+$2.61 (+1.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.07B
Nationwide Bailard Tech & Sci R6
Price$30.99
Change+$0.26 (+0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets180.48M
CCIZX vs NWHTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCIZX vs. NWHTX commentary
Jun 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCIZX is a Buy and NWHTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCIZX has more cash in the bank: 13.1B vs. NWHTX (180M). CCIZX (0.00) and NWHTX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCIZX was incepted earlier than NWHTX: CCIZX (15 years) vs NWHTX (12 years). CCIZX (0.93) is less costly to investors than NWHTX (0.88). CCIZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. NWHTX (20.38). CCIZX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWHTX: CCIZX (2000) vs NWHTX (1000000). NWHTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.01 vs. CCIZX (-4.13). CCIZX return over 5 years is better than : 53.70 vs. NWHTX (22.92).
| CCIZX | NWHTX | CCIZX / NWHTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.88 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.88 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.381 | 2.673 | -201% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.1B | 180M | 7,278% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.13 | -2.01 | 205% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.46 | 35.26 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.70 | 22.92 | 234% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.61 | 71.70 | 151% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement