Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCIZX vs RAGTX
CCIZX vs RAGTX Comparison
Open Charts CCIZX vs RAGTX
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info Inst
Price$165.44
Change+$1.04 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.3B
Virtus Zevenbergen Technology A
Price$72.28
Change-$0.09 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
CCIZX vs RAGTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCIZX vs. RAGTX commentary
Aug 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCIZX is a Buy and RAGTX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCIZX has more cash in the bank: 15.3B vs. RAGTX (1.6B). CCIZX (0.00) and RAGTX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCIZX was incepted earlier than RAGTX: CCIZX (15 years) vs RAGTX (24 years). RAGTX (1.43) is less costly to investors than CCIZX (0.93). CCIZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RAGTX (23.00). CCIZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RAGTX: CCIZX (2000) vs RAGTX (2500). RAGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.44 vs. CCIZX (16.88). CCIZX return over 5 years is better than : 64.05 vs. RAGTX (-3.16).
| CCIZX | RAGTX | CCIZX / RAGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.43 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.43 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.565 | 15.334 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.3B | 1.6B | 954% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.88 | 37.44 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.52 | 60.80 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.05 | -3.16 | -2,026% |
| Returns for 10 years | 166.58 | 25.18 | 662% |