Ad is loading...
CCIZX vs TEFQX
CCIZX vs TEFQX Comparison
Open Charts CCIZX vs TEFQX
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info Inst
Price$126.22
Change+$14.22 (+12.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.52B
Firsthand Technology Opportunities
Price$3.60
Change+$0.43 (+13.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.68M
CCIZX vs TEFQX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCIZX vs. TEFQX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCIZX is a Buy and TEFQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCIZX has more cash in the bank: 10.5B vs. TEFQX (37.7M). CCIZX (0.00) and TEFQX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCIZX was incepted earlier than TEFQX: CCIZX (15 years) vs TEFQX (26 years). TEFQX (1.86) is less costly to investors than CCIZX (0.93). CCIZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. TEFQX (14.00). CCIZX (2000) and TEFQX (2000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TEFQX (-21.34) and CCIZX (-21.38) have marching annual gain over last year. CCIZX return over 5 years is better than : 46.52 vs. TEFQX (-71.75).
| CCIZX | TEFQX | CCIZX / TEFQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.85 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.86 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -24.472 | -16.359 | 150% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.5B | 37.7M | 27,851% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -21.38 | -21.34 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.79 | -75.52 | 14% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.52 | -71.75 | -65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.41 | -65.16 | -119% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...