It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CCJ’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileDMXCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CCJ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DMXCF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
CCJ (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -10.17% price change this week, while DMXCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -10.64% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -3.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.20%.
CCJ is expected to report earnings on Feb 07, 2025.
The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.
CCJ | DMXCF | CCJ / DMXCF | |
Capitalization | 20.4B | N/A | - |
EBITDA | 800M | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 23.944 | 87.675 | 27% |
P/E Ratio | 76.11 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 2.59B | N/A | - |
Total Cash | 567M | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 1.78B | N/A | - |
CCJ | DMXCF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 74 | 9 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 93 Overvalued | 54 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 10 | 74 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 87 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 3 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 42 | 30 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
DMXCF's Valuation (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CCJ (93) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that DMXCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CCJ’s over the last 12 months.
CCJ's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DMXCF (74) in the null industry. This means that CCJ’s stock grew somewhat faster than DMXCF’s over the last 12 months.
CCJ's SMR Rating (87) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as DMXCF (93) in the null industry. This means that CCJ’s stock grew similarly to DMXCF’s over the last 12 months.
DMXCF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as CCJ (44) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that DMXCF’s stock grew similarly to CCJ’s over the last 12 months.
CCJ's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is significantly better than the same rating for DMXCF (100) in the null industry. This means that CCJ’s stock grew significantly faster than DMXCF’s over the last 12 months.
CCJ | DMXCF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago69% | 6 days ago73% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago82% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago65% | 2 days ago85% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 2 days ago76% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago69% | 2 days ago83% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago77% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago81% | 3 days ago85% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago72% | 9 days ago83% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 2 days ago79% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
SUSYX | 16.48 | N/A | N/A |
SEI US Managed Volatility Y (SIMT) | |||
BEQGX | 34.58 | -0.13 | -0.36% |
American Century Equity Growth Inv | |||
FLACX | 82.98 | -0.34 | -0.41% |
Fidelity Advisor Stock Sel All Cp C | |||
MMSCX | 11.30 | -0.15 | -1.31% |
Praxis Small Cap Index A | |||
CLTAX | 15.61 | -0.21 | -1.33% |
Catalyst/Lyons Tactical Allocation A |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CCJ has been closely correlated with DNN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CCJ jumps, then DNN could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that DMXCF and DNN have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DMXCF and DNN's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DMXCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
DMXCF | 100% | -3.04% | ||
DNN - DMXCF | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.98% | ||
UEC - DMXCF | 28% Poorly correlated | -1.95% | ||
WSTRF - DMXCF | 25% Poorly correlated | -3.35% | ||
CCJ - DMXCF | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.42% | ||
ISENF - DMXCF | 23% Poorly correlated | -3.39% | ||
More |