It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CCJ’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGSM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CCJ’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GSM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
CCJ (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +2.00% price change this week, while GSM (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +1.20% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -1.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.62%.
CCJ is expected to report earnings on Feb 07, 2025.
GSM is expected to report earnings on Mar 03, 2025.
The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.
CCJ | GSM | CCJ / GSM | |
Capitalization | 20.4B | 892M | 2,287% |
EBITDA | 800M | 281M | 285% |
Gain YTD | 24.339 | -34.489 | -71% |
P/E Ratio | 76.11 | 10.35 | 735% |
Revenue | 2.59B | 1.72B | 150% |
Total Cash | 567M | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 1.78B | 238M | 750% |
CCJ | GSM | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 76 | 65 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 94 Overvalued | 17 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 10 | 49 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 81 | 73 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 77 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 6 | 11 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GSM's Valuation (17) in the Industrial Specialties industry is significantly better than the same rating for CCJ (94) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that GSM’s stock grew significantly faster than CCJ’s over the last 12 months.
CCJ's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GSM (49) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that CCJ’s stock grew somewhat faster than GSM’s over the last 12 months.
GSM's SMR Rating (73) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as CCJ (81) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that GSM’s stock grew similarly to CCJ’s over the last 12 months.
CCJ's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as GSM (77) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that CCJ’s stock grew similarly to GSM’s over the last 12 months.
CCJ's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as GSM (11) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that CCJ’s stock grew similarly to GSM’s over the last 12 months.
CCJ | GSM | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago75% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago78% | 3 days ago89% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago82% | 3 days ago83% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago76% | 3 days ago83% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% | 3 days ago83% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago67% | 3 days ago79% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 12 days ago80% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago72% | 4 days ago84% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago75% | 3 days ago78% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago75% | 3 days ago73% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
KCVSX | 19.05 | -0.04 | -0.21% |
Knights of Columbus Large Cap Value S | |||
BRMAX | 15.93 | -0.11 | -0.69% |
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Index Inv A | |||
PIEFX | 15.53 | -0.12 | -0.77% |
Federated Hermes Emerging Markets Eq IS | |||
PBLAX | 46.18 | -0.96 | -2.04% |
Principal Blue Chip A | |||
VGORX | 57.30 | -1.44 | -2.45% |
Voya Large-Cap Growth R |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CCJ has been closely correlated with DNN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CCJ jumps, then DNN could also see price increases.