CCJ
Price
$60.42
Change
+$0.39 (+0.65%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
20.38B
54 days until earnings call
GSM
Price
$4.18
Change
+$0.15 (+3.72%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
892.18M
72 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CCJ vs GSM

Header iconCCJ vs GSM Comparison
Open Charts CCJ vs GSMBanner chart's image
Came
Price$60.42
Change+$0.39 (+0.65%)
Volume$3.33M
Capitalization20.38B
Ferroglobe
Price$4.18
Change+$0.15 (+3.72%)
Volume$1.43M
Capitalization892.18M
CCJ vs GSM Comparison Chart
Loading...
CCJ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GSM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CCJ vs. GSM commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCJ is a Buy and GSM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CCJ: $60.42 vs. GSM: $4.18)
Brand notoriety: CCJ: Notable vs. GSM: Not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CCJ: 72% vs. GSM: 130%
Market capitalization -- CCJ: $20.38B vs. GSM: $892.18M
CCJ [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $20.38B. GSM’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $892.18M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CCJ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGSM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CCJ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GSM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CCJ is a better buy in the long-term than GSM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CCJ’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GSM’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CCJ’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • GSM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GSM is a better buy in the short-term than CCJ.

Price Growth

CCJ (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +3.23% price change this week, while GSM (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +15.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.35%.

Reported Earning Dates

CCJ is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

GSM is expected to report earnings on Aug 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.84% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCJ($20.4B) has a higher market cap than GSM($892M). CCJ has higher P/E ratio than GSM: CCJ (76.11) vs GSM (10.35). CCJ YTD gains are higher at: 17.572 vs. GSM (10.375). CCJ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 800M vs. GSM (281M). GSM has less debt than CCJ: GSM (238M) vs CCJ (1.78B). CCJ has higher revenues than GSM: CCJ (2.59B) vs GSM (1.72B).
CCJGSMCCJ / GSM
Capitalization20.4B892M2,287%
EBITDA800M281M285%
Gain YTD17.57210.375169%
P/E Ratio76.1110.35735%
Revenue2.59B1.72B150%
Total Cash567MN/A-
Total Debt1.78B238M750%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CCJ vs GSM: Fundamental Ratings
CCJ
GSM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2273
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1859
SMR RATING
1..100
8491
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3952
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
495
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GSM's Valuation (16) in the Industrial Specialties industry is significantly better than the same rating for CCJ (89) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that GSM’s stock grew significantly faster than CCJ’s over the last 12 months.

CCJ's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GSM (59) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that CCJ’s stock grew somewhat faster than GSM’s over the last 12 months.

CCJ's SMR Rating (84) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as GSM (91) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that CCJ’s stock grew similarly to GSM’s over the last 12 months.

CCJ's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as GSM (52) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that CCJ’s stock grew similarly to GSM’s over the last 12 months.

GSM's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Industrial Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CCJ (49) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that GSM’s stock grew somewhat faster than CCJ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CCJGSM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CCJ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GSM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BGCSX15.56N/A
N/A
Baillie Gifford EAFE Plus All Cap I
SDGAX122.53N/A
N/A
DWS Capital Growth A
ACSTX29.42N/A
N/A
Invesco Comstock A
LNGZX42.30N/A
N/A
Columbia Greater China Inst
TGRFX7.26N/A
N/A
Transamerica International Focus R6

CCJ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CCJ has been closely correlated with NXE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CCJ jumps, then NXE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCJ
1D Price
Change %
CCJ100%
+0.65%
NXE - CCJ
87%
Closely correlated
+1.59%
DNN - CCJ
82%
Closely correlated
+3.70%
UEC - CCJ
78%
Closely correlated
+2.45%
UROY - CCJ
75%
Closely correlated
+2.63%
UUUU - CCJ
73%
Closely correlated
-1.97%
More

GSM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSM has been loosely correlated with MTRN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GSM jumps, then MTRN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GSM
1D Price
Change %
GSM100%
+3.72%
MTRN - GSM
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.25%
TECK - GSM
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.08%
CCJ - GSM
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.65%
ARREF - GSM
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.07%
FCX - GSM
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.50%
More