CCJ vs MGAFF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCJ is a Hold and MGAFF is a Sell.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CCJ’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMGAFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CCJ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- MGAFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CCJ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MGAFF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CCJ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- MGAFF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CCJ (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -5.32% price change this week, while MGAFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -11.26% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -1.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.60%.
Reported Earning Dates
CCJ is expected to report earnings on Feb 07, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Other Metals/Minerals (-1.58% weekly)The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.
| CCJ | MGAFF | CCJ / MGAFF | |
| Capitalization | 20.4B | 64.7M | 31,530% |
| EBITDA | 800M | -5.84M | -13,706% |
| Gain YTD | 23.944 | -28.065 | -85% |
| P/E Ratio | 76.11 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 2.59B | 0 | - |
| Total Cash | 567M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 1.78B | N/A | - |
CCJ | MGAFF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 74 | 12 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 93 Overvalued | 72 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 10 | 43 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 87 | 85 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 3 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 42 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MGAFF's Valuation (72) in the null industry is in the same range as CCJ (93) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that MGAFF’s stock grew similarly to CCJ’s over the last 12 months.
CCJ's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MGAFF (43) in the null industry. This means that CCJ’s stock grew somewhat faster than MGAFF’s over the last 12 months.
MGAFF's SMR Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as CCJ (87) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that MGAFF’s stock grew similarly to CCJ’s over the last 12 months.
CCJ's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as MGAFF (56) in the null industry. This means that CCJ’s stock grew similarly to MGAFF’s over the last 12 months.
CCJ's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is significantly better than the same rating for MGAFF (99) in the null industry. This means that CCJ’s stock grew significantly faster than MGAFF’s over the last 12 months.
| CCJ | MGAFF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 81% | 8 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | N/A |
CCJ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CCJ has been closely correlated with DNN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CCJ jumps, then DNN could also see price increases.
MGAFF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MGAFF has been closely correlated with DNN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MGAFF jumps, then DNN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MGAFF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MGAFF | 100% | -4.54% | ||
| DNN - MGAFF | 71% Closely correlated | -0.98% | ||
| NXE - MGAFF | 71% Closely correlated | -1.49% | ||
| UEC - MGAFF | 66% Loosely correlated | -1.95% | ||
| CCJ - MGAFF | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.42% | ||
| UROY - MGAFF | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.77% | ||
More | ||||