Ad is loading...
CCJTX vs FCJTX
CCJTX vs FCJTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCJTX vs. FCJTX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCJTX is a Hold and FCJTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCJTX (24.2B) and FCJTX (24.2B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FCJTX pays higher dividends than CCJTX: FCJTX (1.25) vs CCJTX (0.22). CCJTX was incepted earlier than FCJTX: CCJTX (11 years) vs FCJTX (8 years). CCJTX (1.46) is less costly to investors than FCJTX (0.39). CCJTX (5.00) and FCJTX (5.00) have comparable annual turnover. CCJTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCJTX: CCJTX (250) vs FCJTX (1000000). FCJTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.16 vs. CCJTX (4.94). FCJTX return over 5 years is better than : 45.34 vs. CCJTX (39.59).
| CCJTX | FCJTX | CCJTX / FCJTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.39 | 374% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.39 | 374% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.376 | -1.031 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.2B | 24.2B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.22 | 1.25 | 18% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.94 | 6.16 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.34 | 19.33 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.59 | 45.34 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.24 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...