Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCJTX vs FHFTX
CCJTX vs FHFTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCJTX vs. FHFTX commentary
Jun 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCJTX is a Hold and FHFTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCJTX has more cash in the bank: 26B vs. FHFTX (1.26B). FHFTX pays higher dividends than CCJTX: FHFTX (0.88) vs CCJTX (0.21). CCJTX was incepted earlier than FHFTX: CCJTX (11 years) vs FHFTX (14 years). CCJTX (1.46) is less costly to investors than FHFTX (1.25). FHFTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.00 vs. CCJTX (5.00). FHFTX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCJTX: FHFTX (0) vs CCJTX (250). CCJTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.22 vs. FHFTX (7.16). CCJTX return over 5 years is better than : 39.05 vs. FHFTX (34.85).
| CCJTX | FHFTX | CCJTX / FHFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.25 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.25 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.621 | 3.098 | 181% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 26B | 1.26B | 2,057% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.21 | 0.88 | 23% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.22 | 7.16 | 143% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.65 | 28.83 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.05 | 34.85 | 112% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.37 | 35.75 | 191% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers