Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCKTX vs NSFMX
CCKTX vs NSFMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCKTX vs. NSFMX commentary
Jul 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCKTX is a Hold and NSFMX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCKTX has more cash in the bank: 17B vs. NSFMX (10.8M). NSFMX pays higher dividends than CCKTX: NSFMX (1.28) vs CCKTX (0.16). CCKTX was incepted earlier than NSFMX: CCKTX (10 years) vs NSFMX (8 years). NSFMX (1.62) is less costly to investors than CCKTX (1.47). NSFMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. CCKTX (5.00). CCKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFMX: CCKTX (250) vs NSFMX (1000000). CCKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.36 vs. NSFMX (8.08). CCKTX return over 5 years is better than : 45.49 vs. NSFMX (30.34).
| CCKTX | NSFMX | CCKTX / NSFMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.49 | 300% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 1.62 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.109 | 6.190 | 163% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17B | 10.8M | 157,407% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 1.28 | 12% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.36 | 8.08 | 153% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.07 | 39.70 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.49 | 30.34 | 150% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.97 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement