Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCKTX vs NSFMX
CCKTX vs NSFMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCKTX vs. NSFMX commentary
Jun 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCKTX is a Hold and NSFMX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCKTX has more cash in the bank: 16.6B vs. NSFMX (15.4M). NSFMX pays higher dividends than CCKTX: NSFMX (1.33) vs CCKTX (0.16). CCKTX was incepted earlier than NSFMX: CCKTX (10 years) vs NSFMX (8 years). NSFMX (2.35) is less costly to investors than CCKTX (1.47). NSFMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. CCKTX (5.00). CCKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFMX: CCKTX (250) vs NSFMX (1000000). CCKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.24 vs. NSFMX (6.11). CCKTX return over 5 years is better than : 46.87 vs. NSFMX (30.63).
| CCKTX | NSFMX | CCKTX / NSFMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.55 | 267% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 2.35 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.467 | 3.914 | 191% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16.6B | 15.4M | 107,792% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 1.33 | 12% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.24 | 6.11 | 168% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.01 | 38.87 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.87 | 30.63 | 153% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.47 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement