Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCKTX vs NSFMX
CCKTX vs NSFMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCKTX vs. NSFMX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCKTX is a Hold and NSFMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCKTX has more cash in the bank: 17.4B vs. NSFMX (6.02M). NSFMX pays higher dividends than CCKTX: NSFMX (1.28) vs CCKTX (0.16). CCKTX was incepted earlier than NSFMX: CCKTX (10 years) vs NSFMX (8 years). NSFMX (1.62) is less costly to investors than CCKTX (1.47). NSFMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. CCKTX (5.00). CCKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFMX: CCKTX (250) vs NSFMX (1000000). CCKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.88 vs. NSFMX (-38.29). CCKTX return over 5 years is better than : 44.92 vs. NSFMX (-28.29).
| CCKTX | NSFMX | CCKTX / NSFMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.49 | 300% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 1.62 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.234 | -39.418 | -31% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.4B | 6.02M | 288,989% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 1.28 | 12% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.88 | -38.29 | -41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.62 | -22.31 | -187% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.92 | -28.29 | -159% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.85 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement