Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCKTX vs PRBMX
CCKTX vs PRBMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCKTX vs. PRBMX commentary
Aug 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCKTX is a Hold and PRBMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCKTX has more cash in the bank: 17.1B vs. PRBMX (214M). PRBMX pays higher dividends than CCKTX: PRBMX (2.26) vs CCKTX (0.15). CCKTX was incepted earlier than PRBMX: CCKTX (10 years) vs PRBMX (6 years). CCKTX (1.47) is less costly to investors than PRBMX (0.16). PRBMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 12.00 vs. CCKTX (5.00). CCKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRBMX: CCKTX (250) vs PRBMX (1000000). PRBMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.76 vs. CCKTX (12.23). PRBMX return over 5 years is better than : 60.26 vs. CCKTX (40.57).
| CCKTX | PRBMX | CCKTX / PRBMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.15 | 980% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.16 | 919% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.592 | 9.368 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.1B | 214M | 7,991% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.15 | 2.26 | 7% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.23 | 13.76 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.95 | 44.42 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.57 | 60.26 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.14 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers