CCOEY
Price
$11.30
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 4 closing price
11 days until earnings call
CLOQ
Price
$0.27
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 4 closing price
Ad is loading...

CCOEY vs CLOQ

Header iconCCOEY vs CLOQ Comparison
Open Charts CCOEY vs CLOQBanner chart's image
Capcom
Price$11.30
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$24.46K
CapitalizationN/A
Cyberloq Technologies
Price$0.27
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$31.13K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
CCOEY vs CLOQ Comparison Chart
Loading...
CCOEY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
CCOEY vs. CLOQ commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCOEY is a Sell and CLOQ is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (CCOEY: $10.81 vs. CLOQ: $0.28)
Brand notoriety: CCOEY and CLOQ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CCOEY: 134% vs. CLOQ: 5%
Market capitalization -- CCOEY: $9.51B vs. CLOQ: $8.03M
CCOEY [@Packaged Software] is valued at $9.51B. CLOQ’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $8.03M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CCOEY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCLOQ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CCOEY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CLOQ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CCOEY is a better buy in the long-term than CLOQ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CCOEY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CCOEY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.

Price Growth

CCOEY (@Packaged Software) experienced а +0.65% price change this week, while CLOQ (@Packaged Software) price change was -1.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

CCOEY is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2025.

CLOQ is expected to report earnings on May 12, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+1.14% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCOEY($9.51B) has a higher market cap than CLOQ($8.03M). CLOQ YTD gains are higher at: 153.670 vs. CCOEY (35.459). CCOEY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 67.8B vs. CLOQ (-485.05K). CCOEY has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. CLOQ (18.7K). CLOQ has less debt than CCOEY: CLOQ (275K) vs CCOEY (7.84B). CCOEY has higher revenues than CLOQ: CCOEY (145B) vs CLOQ (3.36K).
CCOEYCLOQCCOEY / CLOQ
Capitalization9.51B8.03M118,379%
EBITDA67.8B-485.05K-13,977,940%
Gain YTD35.459153.67023%
P/E Ratio28.41N/A-
Revenue145B3.36K4,310,344,828%
Total Cash109B18.7K582,887,701%
Total Debt7.84B275K2,852,000%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CCOEY vs CLOQ: Fundamental Ratings
CCOEY
CLOQ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6072
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1364
SMR RATING
1..100
40100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4935
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
26100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CCOEY's Valuation (64) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLOQ (97). This means that CCOEY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLOQ’s over the last 12 months.

CCOEY's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLOQ (64). This means that CCOEY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLOQ’s over the last 12 months.

CCOEY's SMR Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLOQ (100). This means that CCOEY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLOQ’s over the last 12 months.

CLOQ's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as CCOEY (49). This means that CLOQ’s stock grew similarly to CCOEY’s over the last 12 months.

CCOEY's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLOQ (100). This means that CCOEY’s stock grew significantly faster than CLOQ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CCOEY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CCOEY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

CCOEY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CCOEY has been loosely correlated with NTDOY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CCOEY jumps, then NTDOY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCOEY
1D Price
Change %
CCOEY100%
+0.46%
NTDOY - CCOEY
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.53%
NEXOY - CCOEY
35%
Loosely correlated
-2.48%
SGAMY - CCOEY
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.40%
VMEO - CCOEY
32%
Poorly correlated
-2.20%
NTDOF - CCOEY
32%
Poorly correlated
-2.45%
More

CLOQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLOQ and STER have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLOQ and STER's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLOQ
1D Price
Change %
CLOQ100%
N/A
STER - CLOQ
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.22%
SDCH - CLOQ
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CCOEY - CLOQ
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.46%
BYSD - CLOQ
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CCOEF - CLOQ
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More