CCORF
Price
$6.64
Change
-$0.27 (-3.91%)
Updated
Jan 15 closing price
Capitalization
623.61M
CESTY
Price
$3.50
Change
+$0.22 (+6.71%)
Updated
Oct 1 closing price
Capitalization
540.68M
Ad is loading...

CCORF vs CESTY

Header iconCCORF vs CESTY Comparison
Open Charts CCORF vs CESTYBanner chart's image
Canaccord Genuity Group
Price$6.64
Change-$0.27 (-3.91%)
Volume$2.92K
Capitalization623.61M
Chinese Estates Holdings
Price$3.50
Change+$0.22 (+6.71%)
Volume$3.86K
Capitalization540.68M
CCORF vs CESTY Comparison Chart
Loading...
CCORF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CCORF vs. CESTY commentary
Jan 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCORF is a Hold and CESTY is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 20, 2025
Stock price -- (CCORF: $6.64 vs. CESTY: $3.50)
Brand notoriety: CCORF and CESTY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CCORF: 15% vs. CESTY: 100%
Market capitalization -- CCORF: $623.61M vs. CESTY: $540.68M
CCORF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $623.61M. CESTY’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $540.68M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CCORF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCESTY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CCORF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CESTY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CESTY is a better buy in the long-term than CCORF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CCORF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CCORF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

CCORF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -3.91% price change this week, while CESTY (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +18.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +17.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +31.86%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+18.48% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCORF($624M) has a higher market cap than CESTY($541M). CESTY YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. CCORF (-5.480). CCORF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 88.1M vs. CESTY (-3.26B). CESTY has more cash in the bank: 3.45B vs. CCORF (1.72B). CCORF has less debt than CESTY: CCORF (434M) vs CESTY (5.52B). CCORF has higher revenues than CESTY: CCORF (1.51B) vs CESTY (1.3B).
CCORFCESTYCCORF / CESTY
Capitalization624M541M115%
EBITDA88.1M-3.26B-3%
Gain YTD-5.4800.000-
P/E Ratio10.94N/A-
Revenue1.51B1.3B116%
Total Cash1.72B3.45B50%
Total Debt434M5.52B8%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CCORF vs CESTY: Fundamental Ratings
CCORF
CESTY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
62100
SMR RATING
1..100
8994
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5847
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6355
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CCORF's Valuation (22) in the null industry is in the same range as CESTY (48). This means that CCORF’s stock grew similarly to CESTY’s over the last 12 months.

CCORF's Profit vs Risk Rating (62) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CESTY (100). This means that CCORF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CESTY’s over the last 12 months.

CCORF's SMR Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as CESTY (94). This means that CCORF’s stock grew similarly to CESTY’s over the last 12 months.

CESTY's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as CCORF (58). This means that CESTY’s stock grew similarly to CCORF’s over the last 12 months.

CESTY's P/E Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as CCORF (63). This means that CESTY’s stock grew similarly to CCORF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CCORFCESTY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
39%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
40%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
66%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
71%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CCORF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SLS1.060.08
+7.86%
SELLAS Life Sciences Group
YRD4.920.19
+4.02%
Yiren Digital Ltd
MS137.872.06
+1.52%
Morgan Stanley
AZEK49.970.07
+0.14%
AZEK Company (The)
GOGL8.86-0.13
-1.45%
Golden Ocean Group Limited

CCORF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CCORF has been loosely correlated with CLSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CCORF jumps, then CLSK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCORF
1D Price
Change %
CCORF100%
N/A
CLSK - CCORF
34%
Loosely correlated
+6.17%
MQBKY - CCORF
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.26%
HUT - CCORF
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.24%
WULF - CCORF
29%
Poorly correlated
+9.40%
CIFR - CCORF
28%
Poorly correlated
+4.42%
More

CESTY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CESTY and FDS have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CESTY and FDS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CESTY
1D Price
Change %
CESTY100%
N/A
FDS - CESTY
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.66%
FUTU - CESTY
20%
Poorly correlated
+8.87%
CCORF - CESTY
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BOMXF - CESTY
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.99%
BBKCF - CESTY
6%
Poorly correlated
-10.43%
More