CCOZF
Price
$1.15
Change
+$0.11 (+10.58%)
Updated
Apr 21 closing price
Capitalization
13.77B
SXC
Price
$9.15
Change
+$0.05 (+0.55%)
Updated
May 2 closing price
Capitalization
947.53M
93 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CCOZF vs SXC

Header iconCCOZF vs SXC Comparison
Open Charts CCOZF vs SXCBanner chart's image
China Coal Energy
Price$1.15
Change+$0.11 (+10.58%)
Volume$1.5K
Capitalization13.77B
Suncoke Energy
Price$9.15
Change+$0.05 (+0.55%)
Volume$897.45K
Capitalization947.53M
CCOZF vs SXC Comparison Chart
Loading...
SXC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CCOZF vs. SXC commentary
May 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCOZF is a Hold and SXC is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 04, 2025
Stock price -- (CCOZF: $1.15 vs. SXC: $9.15)
Brand notoriety: CCOZF and SXC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Coal industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CCOZF: 43% vs. SXC: 99%
Market capitalization -- CCOZF: $13.77B vs. SXC: $947.53M
CCOZF [@Coal] is valued at $13.77B. SXC’s [@Coal] market capitalization is $947.53M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Coal] industry ranges from $75.88B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Coal] industry is $6.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CCOZF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSXC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CCOZF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SXC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CCOZF is a better buy in the long-term than SXC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SXC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SXC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

CCOZF (@Coal) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SXC (@Coal) price change was -4.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Coal industry was -0.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was -17.59%.

Reported Earning Dates

SXC is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Coal (-0.66% weekly)

Companies that mine, process and distribute coal and lignite. Coal goes towards around 30% of global energy production, and is heavily relied upon for electricity generation. Alliance Resource Partners, L.P., Peabody Energy Corporation and Arch Coal Inc. are major coal companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCOZF($13.8B) has a higher market cap than SXC($948M). SXC has higher P/E ratio than CCOZF: SXC (16.57) vs CCOZF (3.72). CCOZF YTD gains are higher at: 5.023 vs. SXC (-13.451). CCOZF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 36.7B vs. SXC (268M). CCOZF has more cash in the bank: 95.5B vs. SXC (140M). SXC has less debt than CCOZF: SXC (490M) vs CCOZF (83.1B). CCOZF has higher revenues than SXC: CCOZF (218B) vs SXC (2.06B).
CCOZFSXCCCOZF / SXC
Capitalization13.8B948M1,456%
EBITDA36.7B268M13,694%
Gain YTD5.023-13.451-37%
P/E Ratio3.7216.5722%
Revenue218B2.06B10,567%
Total Cash95.5B140M68,214%
Total Debt83.1B490M16,959%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CCOZF vs SXC: Fundamental Ratings
CCOZF
SXC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5044
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1327
SMR RATING
1..100
6155
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4671
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3190
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CCOZF's Valuation (17) in the null industry is in the same range as SXC (33) in the Coal industry. This means that CCOZF’s stock grew similarly to SXC’s over the last 12 months.

CCOZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the null industry is in the same range as SXC (27) in the Coal industry. This means that CCOZF’s stock grew similarly to SXC’s over the last 12 months.

SXC's SMR Rating (55) in the Coal industry is in the same range as CCOZF (61) in the null industry. This means that SXC’s stock grew similarly to CCOZF’s over the last 12 months.

CCOZF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as SXC (71) in the Coal industry. This means that CCOZF’s stock grew similarly to SXC’s over the last 12 months.

CCOZF's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SXC (90) in the Coal industry. This means that CCOZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SXC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SXC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SXC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PXQSX24.140.46
+1.94%
Virtus KAR Small-Cap Value I
NBRRX24.010.42
+1.78%
Neuberger Berman M/C Intrinsic Val R3
FESOX25.940.26
+1.01%
First Eagle Overseas C
NWXSX9.870.09
+0.92%
Nationwide International Sm Cp A
FFNAX13.070.07
+0.54%
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 40% A

CCOZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CCOZF and BTURF have been poorly correlated (+19% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCOZF and BTURF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCOZF
1D Price
Change %
CCOZF100%
N/A
BTURF - CCOZF
19%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BTU - CCOZF
16%
Poorly correlated
+3.22%
ARLP - CCOZF
14%
Poorly correlated
+2.88%
ARCH - CCOZF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SXC - CCOZF
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.55%
More

SXC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SXC has been loosely correlated with AMR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SXC jumps, then AMR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SXC
1D Price
Change %
SXC100%
+0.55%
AMR - SXC
56%
Loosely correlated
+4.52%
HCC - SXC
55%
Loosely correlated
+4.36%
BTU - SXC
49%
Loosely correlated
+3.22%
ARCH - SXC
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
METC - SXC
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.50%
More