It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CCOZY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileHNRG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CCOZY’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HNRG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
CCOZY (@Coal) experienced а +11.65% price change this week, while HNRG (@Coal) price change was -11.96% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Coal industry was -1.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.29%.
CCOZY is expected to report earnings on Mar 20, 2025.
HNRG is expected to report earnings on Mar 17, 2025.
Companies that mine, process and distribute coal and lignite. Coal goes towards around 30% of global energy production, and is heavily relied upon for electricity generation. Alliance Resource Partners, L.P., Peabody Energy Corporation and Arch Coal Inc. are major coal companies in the U.S.
CCOZY | HNRG | CCOZY / HNRG | |
Capitalization | 13.8B | 167M | 8,263% |
EBITDA | 36.7B | 127M | 28,898% |
Gain YTD | 78.603 | 25.792 | 305% |
P/E Ratio | 3.84 | 3.84 | 100% |
Revenue | 218B | 634M | 34,385% |
Total Cash | 95.5B | 2.84M | 3,360,310% |
Total Debt | 83.1B | 119M | 69,832% |
CCOZY | HNRG | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 34 | 60 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 20 Undervalued | 80 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 3 | 42 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 62 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 14 | 9 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CCOZY's Valuation (20) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HNRG (80) in the Coal industry. This means that CCOZY’s stock grew somewhat faster than HNRG’s over the last 12 months.
CCOZY's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HNRG (42) in the Coal industry. This means that CCOZY’s stock grew somewhat faster than HNRG’s over the last 12 months.
CCOZY's SMR Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as HNRG (91) in the Coal industry. This means that CCOZY’s stock grew similarly to HNRG’s over the last 12 months.
CCOZY's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as HNRG (38) in the Coal industry. This means that CCOZY’s stock grew similarly to HNRG’s over the last 12 months.
HNRG's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Coal industry is in the same range as CCOZY (14) in the null industry. This means that HNRG’s stock grew similarly to CCOZY’s over the last 12 months.
CCOZY | HNRG | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago44% | 1 day ago80% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago47% | 1 day ago89% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago39% | 1 day ago81% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago33% | 1 day ago79% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago39% | 1 day ago79% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago38% | 1 day ago85% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago71% | 10 days ago88% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago80% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago33% | 1 day ago86% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago58% | 1 day ago86% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
GCSIX | 28.97 | N/A | N/A |
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Eq Insghts Instl | |||
MLOIX | 8.18 | -0.21 | -2.50% |
Cohen & Steers Future of Energy I | |||
ABCVX | 23.20 | -0.61 | -2.56% |
American Beacon The London Co Inc Eq Inv | |||
VRTTX | 503.65 | -16.41 | -3.16% |
Vanguard Russell 3000 Index I | |||
PHPSX | 20.67 | -0.88 | -4.08% |
ProFunds Pharmaceuticals UltraSector Svc |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CCOZY and CUAEF have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCOZY and CUAEF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CCOZY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CCOZY | 100% | N/A | ||
CUAEF - CCOZY | 13% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
MOGLF - CCOZY | 10% Poorly correlated | +0.55% | ||
HNRG - CCOZY | 4% Poorly correlated | -5.44% | ||
AREC - CCOZY | 3% Poorly correlated | -4.63% | ||
ITAYY - CCOZY | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HNRG has been loosely correlated with BTU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HNRG jumps, then BTU could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HNRG | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HNRG | 100% | -5.44% | ||
BTU - HNRG | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.51% | ||
CEIX - HNRG | 36% Loosely correlated | -1.84% | ||
ARLP - HNRG | 31% Poorly correlated | -1.25% | ||
HCC - HNRG | 30% Poorly correlated | -2.01% | ||
ARCH - HNRG | 30% Poorly correlated | -1.62% | ||
More |