Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCSGX vs PMBCX
CCSGX vs PMBCX Comparison
Open Charts CCSGX vs PMBCX
Conestoga SMid Cap Institutional
Price$25.62
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets636.92M
CCSGX vs PMBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCSGX vs. PMBCX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCSGX is a Hold and PMBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBCX has more cash in the bank: 32.4B vs. CCSGX (637M). CCSGX (0.00) and PMBCX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCSGX was incepted earlier than PMBCX: CCSGX (11 years) vs PMBCX (19 years). PMBCX (1.75) is less costly to investors than CCSGX (1.02). PMBCX (10.50) and CCSGX (10.00) have comparable annual turnover. PMBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCSGX: PMBCX (1000) vs CCSGX (250000). PMBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.26 vs. CCSGX (5.91). PMBCX return over 5 years is better than : 35.29 vs. CCSGX (30.60).
| CCSGX | PMBCX | CCSGX / PMBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.75 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.75 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.475 | 5.299 | -47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 1000 | 25,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 637M | 32.4B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.91 | 11.26 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.29 | 30.42 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.60 | 35.29 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 165.39 | 71.67 | 231% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement