Ad is loading...
CCSMX vs PAMCX
CCSMX vs PAMCX Comparison
Open Charts CCSMX vs PAMCX
Conestoga SMid Cap Investors
Price$26.30
Change+$0.05 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets734.34M
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Adv
Price$96.40
Change+$0.36 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets30.69B
CCSMX vs PAMCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCSMX vs. PAMCX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCSMX is a Hold and PAMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAMCX has more cash in the bank: 30.7B vs. CCSMX (734M). CCSMX (0.00) and PAMCX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCSMX was incepted earlier than PAMCX: CCSMX (11 years) vs PAMCX (25 years). PAMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 21.70 vs. CCSMX (9.00). CCSMX (2500) and PAMCX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CCSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.53 vs. PAMCX (2.30). CCSMX return over 5 years is better than : 43.64 vs. PAMCX (1.44).
| CCSMX | PAMCX | CCSMX / PAMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.734 | 2.597 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 734M | 30.7B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.53 | 2.30 | 718% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.30 | -5.16 | -297% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.64 | 1.44 | 3,027% |
| Returns for 10 years | 198.19 | 33.00 | 601% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...