24 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...
CCSO vs PLL
CCSO vs PLL Comparison
Open Charts CCSO vs PLL
Carbon Collective Climate Sol US Eq ETF
Price$17.52
Change-$0.09 (-0.51%)
Volume$200
Net Assets25.53M
Piedmont Lithium
Price$5.57
Change-$0.21 (-3.63%)
Volume$1.08K
Capitalization256.53M
CCSO vs PLL Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCSO vs. PLL commentary
Apr 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCSO is a Hold and PLL is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PLL: Fundamental Ratings
PLL | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 28 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 91 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| RPMAX | 13.66 | -0.55 | -3.87% |
| Reinhart Genesis PMV Investor | |||
| GEMJX | 10.83 | -0.47 | -4.16% |
| Goldman Sachs Emerging Mkt Eq ex. ChnIns | |||
| ISCTX | 14.99 | -0.82 | -5.19% |
| Voya SmallCap Opportunities Port S2 | |||
| LGLQX | 34.80 | -2.49 | -6.68% |
| Lord Abbett Growth Leaders R2 | |||
| FSLBX | 146.33 | -12.63 | -7.95% |
| Fidelity Select Brokerage & Inv Mgmt | |||
CCSO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CCSO has been closely correlated with BLDP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CCSO jumps, then BLDP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CCSO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCSO | 100% | -5.89% | ||
| BLDP - CCSO | 68% Closely correlated | -3.57% | ||
| PLL - CCSO | 67% Closely correlated | -2.03% | ||
| BLD - CCSO | 66% Closely correlated | +6.64% | ||
| RUN - CCSO | 66% Loosely correlated | +6.07% | ||
| MP - CCSO | 66% Loosely correlated | -7.09% | ||
More | ||||
PLL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLL has been loosely correlated with LAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PLL jumps, then LAR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PLL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLL | 100% | -2.03% | ||
| LAR - PLL | 54% Loosely correlated | -5.91% | ||
| LAC - PLL | 53% Loosely correlated | -5.19% | ||
| SGML - PLL | 48% Loosely correlated | -14.65% | ||
| FSUGY - PLL | 48% Loosely correlated | -8.87% | ||
| GLNCY - PLL | 47% Loosely correlated | -11.50% | ||
More | ||||