Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCWAX vs FIBPX
CCWAX vs FIBPX Comparison
Open Charts CCWAX vs FIBPX
American Funds Capital World Bond 529A
Price$16.54
Change+$0.03 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.97B
Federated Hermes Intl Bond Strategy
Price$13.07
Change+$0.04 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.73M
CCWAX vs FIBPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCWAX vs. FIBPX commentary
Aug 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCWAX is a Hold and FIBPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCWAX has more cash in the bank: 9.97B vs. FIBPX (81.7M). FIBPX pays higher dividends than CCWAX: FIBPX (5.01) vs CCWAX (3.29). CCWAX was incepted earlier than FIBPX: CCWAX (23 years) vs FIBPX (17 years). CCWAX (1.00) is less costly to investors than FIBPX (0.61). CCWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 251.00 vs. FIBPX (5.00). FIBPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCWAX: FIBPX (0) vs CCWAX (250). FIBPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.10 vs. CCWAX (3.40). FIBPX return over 5 years is better than : 0.97 vs. CCWAX (-12.95).
| CCWAX | FIBPX | CCWAX / FIBPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.02 | 5,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.61 | 164% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.371 | 7.864 | 94% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.97B | 81.7M | 12,204% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.29 | 5.01 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.40 | 8.10 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.20 | 19.32 | 32% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.95 | 0.97 | -1,334% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.26 | 27.54 | 19% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement