Ad is loading...
CCWSX vs FEUPX
CCWSX vs FEUPX Comparison
Open Charts CCWSX vs FEUPX
Baird Chautauqua International Gr I
Price$19.73
Change+$0.33 (+1.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.1B
American Funds Europacific Growth F3
Price$55.80
Change+$0.65 (+1.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets123.11B
CCWSX vs FEUPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCWSX vs. FEUPX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCWSX is a Buy and FEUPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FEUPX has more cash in the bank: 123B vs. CCWSX (1.1B). FEUPX pays higher dividends than CCWSX: FEUPX (1.49) vs CCWSX (0.42). CCWSX was incepted earlier than FEUPX: CCWSX (9 years) vs FEUPX (8 years). CCWSX (1.11) is less costly to investors than FEUPX (0.47). FEUPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. CCWSX (12.00). CCWSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FEUPX: CCWSX (2500) vs FEUPX (1000000). CCWSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.27 vs. FEUPX (-3.89). CCWSX return over 5 years is better than : 73.33 vs. FEUPX (25.89).
| CCWSX | FEUPX | CCWSX / FEUPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.47 | 223% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.47 | 236% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.507 | 1.209 | 207% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.1B | 123B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.42 | 1.49 | 29% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.27 | -3.89 | -290% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.76 | 5.21 | 475% |
| Returns for 5 years | 73.33 | 25.89 | 283% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |