CDBMF
Price
$0.53
Change
+$0.02 (+3.92%)
Updated
Jun 20 closing price
Capitalization
26.59M
SFRRF
Price
$7.40
Change
+$0.85 (+12.98%)
Updated
May 30 closing price
Capitalization
2.39B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CDBMF vs SFRRF

Header iconCDBMF vs SFRRF Comparison
Open Charts CDBMF vs SFRRFBanner chart's image
Cordoba Minerals
Price$0.53
Change+$0.02 (+3.92%)
Volume$28K
Capitalization26.59M
Sandfire Resources NL
Price$7.40
Change+$0.85 (+12.98%)
Volume$509
Capitalization2.39B
CDBMF vs SFRRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CDBMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFRRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CDBMF vs. SFRRF commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDBMF is a Hold and SFRRF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (CDBMF: $0.53 vs. SFRRF: $7.40)
Brand notoriety: CDBMF and SFRRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CDBMF: 172% vs. SFRRF: 52%
Market capitalization -- CDBMF: $26.59M vs. SFRRF: $2.39B
CDBMF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $26.59M. SFRRF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $2.39B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CDBMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSFRRF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CDBMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SFRRF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SFRRF is a better buy in the long-term than CDBMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CDBMF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFRRF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CDBMF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • SFRRF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SFRRF is a better buy in the short-term than CDBMF.

Price Growth

CDBMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SFRRF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.02%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.12% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFRRF($2.39B) has a higher market cap than CDBMF($26.6M). CDBMF YTD gains are higher at: 89.350 vs. SFRRF (18.211). SFRRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 261M vs. CDBMF (-31.74M). SFRRF has more cash in the bank: 142M vs. CDBMF (1.15M). CDBMF has less debt than SFRRF: CDBMF (651K) vs SFRRF (597M). SFRRF has higher revenues than CDBMF: SFRRF (770M) vs CDBMF (0).
CDBMFSFRRFCDBMF / SFRRF
Capitalization26.6M2.39B1%
EBITDA-31.74M261M-12%
Gain YTD89.35018.211491%
P/E RatioN/A13.11-
Revenue0770M-
Total Cash1.15M142M1%
Total Debt651K597M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CDBMF vs SFRRF: Fundamental Ratings
CDBMF
SFRRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3947
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10050
SMR RATING
1..100
9993
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3848
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10029
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SFRRF's Valuation (19) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CDBMF (72). This means that SFRRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CDBMF’s over the last 12 months.

SFRRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CDBMF (100). This means that SFRRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CDBMF’s over the last 12 months.

SFRRF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as CDBMF (99). This means that SFRRF’s stock grew similarly to CDBMF’s over the last 12 months.

CDBMF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as SFRRF (48). This means that CDBMF’s stock grew similarly to SFRRF’s over the last 12 months.

SFRRF's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CDBMF (100). This means that SFRRF’s stock grew significantly faster than CDBMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CDBMFSFRRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CDBMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFRRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ORENF4.490.04
+0.90%
Origin Enterprises PLC
MAWHY9.83N/A
N/A
Man Wah Holdings, Ltd.
WEICF2.21N/A
N/A
Weichai Power Company Ltd.
TETAA14.95N/A
N/A
Teton Advisors Inc.
DSHKN7.50N/A
N/A
Drive Shack Inc.

CDBMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CDBMF and SFRRF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CDBMF and SFRRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDBMF
1D Price
Change %
CDBMF100%
N/A
SFRRF - CDBMF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHXMF - CDBMF
9%
Poorly correlated
+1.39%
CBBHF - CDBMF
6%
Poorly correlated
+10.16%
CGMLF - CDBMF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CBBLF - CDBMF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SFRRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SFRRF and FCX have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SFRRF and FCX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFRRF
1D Price
Change %
SFRRF100%
N/A
FCX - SFRRF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.07%
SCCO - SFRRF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.22%
GLNCY - SFRRF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.12%
BATXF - SFRRF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IE - SFRRF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.30%
More