CDBT
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 16 closing price
HCVI
Price
$10.58
Change
-$0.04 (-0.38%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Ad is loading...

CDBT vs HCVI

Header iconCDBT vs HCVI Comparison
Open Charts CDBT vs HCVIBanner chart's image
China Dasheng Biotechnology
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.43K
CapitalizationN/A
Hennessy Capital Investment
Price$10.58
Change-$0.04 (-0.38%)
Volume$2.85K
CapitalizationN/A
CDBT vs HCVI Comparison Chart
Loading...
CDBT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HCVI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CDBT vs. HCVI commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDBT is a Hold and HCVI is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (CDBT: $0.05 vs. HCVI: $10.58)
Brand notoriety: CDBT and HCVI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CDBT: 10% vs. HCVI: 25%
Market capitalization -- CDBT: $3.6M vs. HCVI: $173.48M
CDBT [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $3.6M. HCVI’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $173.48M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $2.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CDBT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHCVI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CDBT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HCVI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CDBT is a better buy in the long-term than HCVI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CDBT’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HCVI’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CDBT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • HCVI’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CDBT is a better buy in the short-term than HCVI.

Price Growth

CDBT (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HCVI (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was -0.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

HCVI is expected to report earnings on Mar 28, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-0.82% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HCVI($173M) has a higher market cap than CDBT($3.6M). CDBT YTD gains are higher at: 108.333 vs. HCVI (1.245).
CDBTHCVICDBT / HCVI
Capitalization3.6M173M2%
EBITDAN/A-6.65M-
Gain YTD108.3331.2458,702%
P/E RatioN/A69.53-
RevenueN/A0-
Total CashN/A462K-
Total DebtN/A1.1M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CDBT: Fundamental Ratings
CDBT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
42
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
45
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CDBTHCVI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
3%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
20%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
N/A
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
24%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
24%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
20%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CDBT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HCVI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GITIX37.86N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Technology Opps Inst
PADEX23.25N/A
N/A
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Gr R5
BOSYX19.14N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon Sm Cp Val Y
BGPTX12.63-0.32
-2.48%
Baillie Gifford Developed EAFE All Cap 2
JDMNX143.30-4.59
-3.10%
Janus Henderson Enterprise N

CDBT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDBT has been loosely correlated with SVIIU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CDBT jumps, then SVIIU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDBT
1D Price
Change %
CDBT100%
N/A
SVIIU - CDBT
65%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FCIC - CDBT
52%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NGRC - CDBT
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HCVI - CDBT
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.38%
BOREF - CDBT
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HCVI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HCVI has been loosely correlated with NVAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HCVI jumps, then NVAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HCVI
1D Price
Change %
HCVI100%
-0.38%
NVAC - HCVI
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PWUPU - HCVI
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PFTAU - HCVI
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DUET - HCVI
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ALSA - HCVI
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More