CDE
Price
$6.88
Change
+$0.40 (+6.17%)
Updated
Oct 18, 11:21 AM (EDT)
19 days until earnings call
PLG
Price
$1.81
Change
+$0.04 (+2.26%)
Updated
Oct 18, 11:40 AM (EDT)
33 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CDE vs PLG

Header iconCDE vs PLG Comparison
Open Charts CDE vs PLGBanner chart's image
Coeur Mining
Price$6.88
Change+$0.40 (+6.17%)
Volume$52.6K
CapitalizationN/A
Platinum Group Metals
Price$1.81
Change+$0.04 (+2.26%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
CDE vs PLG Comparison Chart
Loading...
CDE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
PLG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
CDE vs. PLG commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDE is a Hold and PLG is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (CDE: $6.48 vs. PLG: $1.77)
Brand notoriety: CDE and PLG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CDE: 110% vs. PLG: 573%
Market capitalization -- CDE: $1.49B vs. PLG: $118.83M
CDE [@Precious Metals] is valued at $1.49B. PLG’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $118.83M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CDE’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePLG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CDE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PLG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CDE and PLG are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CDE’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PLG’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CDE’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PLG’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PLG is a better buy in the short-term than CDE.

Price Growth

CDE (@Precious Metals) experienced а +1.25% price change this week, while PLG (@Precious Metals) price change was +14.94% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.61%.

Reported Earning Dates

CDE is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2025.

PLG is expected to report earnings on Jan 10, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.12% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CDE($1.49B) has a higher market cap than PLG($119M). CDE YTD gains are higher at: 98.773 vs. PLG (55.263). CDE has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 57.8M vs. PLG (-5.09M). CDE has more cash in the bank: 61.6M vs. PLG (7.11M). PLG has less debt than CDE: PLG (302K) vs CDE (555M). CDE has higher revenues than PLG: CDE (821M) vs PLG (0).
CDEPLGCDE / PLG
Capitalization1.49B119M1,248%
EBITDA57.8M-5.09M-1,136%
Gain YTD98.77355.263179%
P/E Ratio20.66N/A-
Revenue821M0-
Total Cash61.6M7.11M867%
Total Debt555M302K183,775%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CDE vs PLG: Fundamental Ratings
CDE
PLG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1319
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8496
SMR RATING
1..100
9394
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3948
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9884
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CDE's Valuation (75) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as PLG (95). This means that CDE’s stock grew similarly to PLG’s over the last 12 months.

CDE's Profit vs Risk Rating (84) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as PLG (96). This means that CDE’s stock grew similarly to PLG’s over the last 12 months.

CDE's SMR Rating (93) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as PLG (94). This means that CDE’s stock grew similarly to PLG’s over the last 12 months.

CDE's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as PLG (48). This means that CDE’s stock grew similarly to PLG’s over the last 12 months.

PLG's P/E Growth Rating (84) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as CDE (98). This means that PLG’s stock grew similarly to CDE’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CDEPLG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CDE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
PLG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

CDE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDE has been closely correlated with HL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CDE jumps, then HL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDE
1D Price
Change %
CDE100%
-0.77%
HL - CDE
85%
Closely correlated
-1.33%
PAAS - CDE
77%
Closely correlated
+0.32%
MAG - CDE
77%
Closely correlated
+0.57%
AG - CDE
76%
Closely correlated
-2.62%
AEM - CDE
75%
Closely correlated
-0.04%
More

PLG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLG has been loosely correlated with HL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PLG jumps, then HL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PLG
1D Price
Change %
PLG100%
+17.22%
HL - PLG
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.33%
CDE - PLG
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.77%
ASM - PLG
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.59%
PAAS - PLG
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.32%
MAG - PLG
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.57%
More