CDEVF
Price
$3.53
Change
-$0.42 (-10.63%)
Updated
Nov 26 closing price
Capitalization
5.05B
CLLNY
Price
$19.42
Change
+$0.01 (+0.05%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
26.18B
56 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CDEVF vs CLLNY

Header iconCDEVF vs CLLNY Comparison
Open Charts CDEVF vs CLLNYBanner chart's image
City Developments
Price$3.53
Change-$0.42 (-10.63%)
Volume$100
Capitalization5.05B
Cellnex Telecom SA
Price$19.42
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
Volume$48.56K
Capitalization26.18B
CDEVF vs CLLNY Comparison Chart
Loading...
CLLNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CDEVF vs. CLLNY commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDEVF is a Hold and CLLNY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CDEVF: $3.53 vs. CLLNY: $19.42)
Brand notoriety: CDEVF and CLLNY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CDEVF: 100% vs. CLLNY: 60%
Market capitalization -- CDEVF: $5.05B vs. CLLNY: $26.18B
CDEVF [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $5.05B. CLLNY’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $26.18B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CDEVF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCLLNY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CDEVF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CLLNY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CLLNY is a better buy in the long-term than CDEVF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLLNY’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CLLNY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

CDEVF (@Real Estate Development) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CLLNY (@Real Estate Development) price change was +2.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +0.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.39%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLLNY is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+0.55% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLLNY($26.2B) has a higher market cap than CDEVF($5.05B). CLLNY YTD gains are higher at: 24.567 vs. CDEVF (0.000).
CDEVFCLLNYCDEVF / CLLNY
Capitalization5.05B26.2B19%
EBITDA2.24BN/A-
Gain YTD0.00024.567-
P/E Ratio5.02N/A-
Revenue2.91BN/A-
Total Cash2.16BN/A-
Total Debt10.1BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CDEVF vs CLLNY: Fundamental Ratings
CDEVF
CLLNY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
394
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9999
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7350
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8110
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CDEVF's Valuation (92) in the null industry is in the same range as CLLNY (99). This means that CDEVF’s stock grew similarly to CLLNY’s over the last 12 months.

CDEVF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CLLNY (100). This means that CDEVF’s stock grew similarly to CLLNY’s over the last 12 months.

CDEVF's SMR Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as CLLNY (99). This means that CDEVF’s stock grew similarly to CLLNY’s over the last 12 months.

CLLNY's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as CDEVF (73). This means that CLLNY’s stock grew similarly to CDEVF’s over the last 12 months.

CLLNY's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CDEVF (81). This means that CLLNY’s stock grew significantly faster than CDEVF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLLNY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLLNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
THOGX42.230.22
+0.52%
Thornburg Global Opportunities R6
VVORX20.87N/A
N/A
Invesco Value Opportunities R
VDMAX9.96N/A
N/A
Virtus KAR Developing Markets A
FGNCX12.38N/A
N/A
Nuveen Global Infrastructure C
ASQGX15.71N/A
N/A
American Century Small Company R5

CDEVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDEVF has been loosely correlated with HYSNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CDEVF jumps, then HYSNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDEVF
1D Price
Change %
CDEVF100%
N/A
HYSNF - CDEVF
43%
Loosely correlated
N/A
LLESF - CDEVF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MITEF - CDEVF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
CHKGF - CDEVF
17%
Poorly correlated
-10.34%
CLLNY - CDEVF
13%
Poorly correlated
+0.05%
More

CLLNY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLLNY has been closely correlated with VONOY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLLNY jumps, then VONOY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLLNY
1D Price
Change %
CLLNY100%
+0.05%
VONOY - CLLNY
67%
Closely correlated
-0.36%
CLNXF - CLLNY
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.39%
NMRK - CLLNY
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.98%
MMI - CLLNY
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.60%
STHO - CLLNY
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.19%
More