CDEVF
Price
$3.53
Change
-$0.42 (-10.63%)
Updated
Nov 26 closing price
Capitalization
5.05B
MITEF
Price
$18.20
Change
-$0.38 (-2.05%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
15.84B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CDEVF vs MITEF

Header iconCDEVF vs MITEF Comparison
Open Charts CDEVF vs MITEFBanner chart's image
City Developments
Price$3.53
Change-$0.42 (-10.63%)
Volume$100
Capitalization5.05B
Mitsubishi Estate
Price$18.20
Change-$0.38 (-2.05%)
Volume$1.53K
Capitalization15.84B
CDEVF vs MITEF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MITEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CDEVF vs. MITEF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDEVF is a Hold and MITEF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CDEVF: $3.53 vs. MITEF: $18.20)
Brand notoriety: CDEVF and MITEF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CDEVF: 100% vs. MITEF: 169%
Market capitalization -- CDEVF: $5.05B vs. MITEF: $15.84B
CDEVF [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $5.05B. MITEF’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $15.84B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CDEVF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMITEF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CDEVF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MITEF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MITEF is a better buy in the long-term than CDEVF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MITEF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MITEF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

CDEVF (@Real Estate Development) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MITEF (@Real Estate Development) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +2.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.17%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+2.33% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MITEF($15.8B) has a higher market cap than CDEVF($5.05B). MITEF has higher P/E ratio than CDEVF: MITEF (13.39) vs CDEVF (5.02). MITEF YTD gains are higher at: 30.000 vs. CDEVF (0.000). MITEF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 396B vs. CDEVF (2.24B). MITEF has more cash in the bank: 1.05T vs. CDEVF (2.16B). CDEVF has less debt than MITEF: CDEVF (10.1B) vs MITEF (3.02T). MITEF has higher revenues than CDEVF: MITEF (1.35T) vs CDEVF (2.91B).
CDEVFMITEFCDEVF / MITEF
Capitalization5.05B15.8B32%
EBITDA2.24B396B1%
Gain YTD0.00030.000-
P/E Ratio5.0213.3937%
Revenue2.91B1.35T0%
Total Cash2.16B1.05T0%
Total Debt10.1B3.02T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CDEVF vs MITEF: Fundamental Ratings
CDEVF
MITEF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10077
SMR RATING
1..100
98100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7449
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8469
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CDEVF's Valuation (76) in the null industry is in the same range as MITEF (87). This means that CDEVF’s stock grew similarly to MITEF’s over the last 12 months.

MITEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as CDEVF (100). This means that MITEF’s stock grew similarly to CDEVF’s over the last 12 months.

CDEVF's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as MITEF (100). This means that CDEVF’s stock grew similarly to MITEF’s over the last 12 months.

MITEF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as CDEVF (74). This means that MITEF’s stock grew similarly to CDEVF’s over the last 12 months.

MITEF's P/E Growth Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as CDEVF (84). This means that MITEF’s stock grew similarly to CDEVF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CDEVFMITEF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
22%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MITEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FYX100.710.93
+0.93%
First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX® ETF
IWB343.732.76
+0.81%
iShares Russell 1000 ETF
DHY2.150.01
+0.47%
Credit Suisse High Yield
VPC20.680.07
+0.36%
Virtus Private Credit ETF
ETEC20.79N/A
N/A
iShares Breakthrough Envirtl Sol ETF

CDEVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDEVF has been loosely correlated with HYSNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CDEVF jumps, then HYSNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDEVF
1D Price
Change %
CDEVF100%
N/A
HYSNF - CDEVF
43%
Loosely correlated
N/A
LLESF - CDEVF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MITEF - CDEVF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHKGF - CDEVF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLLNY - CDEVF
13%
Poorly correlated
-1.41%
More

MITEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MITEF has been loosely correlated with MTSFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MITEF jumps, then MTSFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MITEF
1D Price
Change %
MITEF100%
N/A
MTSFF - MITEF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SURDF - MITEF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MITEY - MITEF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.61%
CDEVF - MITEF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRRLF - MITEF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More