CDHSF
Price
$0.62
Change
+$0.01 (+1.64%)
Updated
Mar 4 closing price
Capitalization
933.17M
CROMF
Price
$11.00
Change
+$0.09 (+0.82%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
1.83B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CDHSF vs CROMF

Header iconCDHSF vs CROMF Comparison
Open Charts CDHSF vs CROMFBanner chart's image
CDL Hospitality Trust
Price$0.62
Change+$0.01 (+1.64%)
Volume$200
Capitalization933.17M
Crombie Real Estate Investment Trust
Price$11.00
Change+$0.09 (+0.82%)
Volume$39.67K
Capitalization1.83B
CDHSF vs CROMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CROMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CDHSF vs. CROMF commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDHSF is a Hold and CROMF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (CDHSF: $0.62 vs. CROMF: $11.00)
Brand notoriety: CDHSF and CROMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CDHSF: 100% vs. CROMF: 5%
Market capitalization -- CDHSF: $933.17M vs. CROMF: $1.83B
CDHSF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $933.17M. CROMF’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $1.83B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CDHSF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCROMF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CDHSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CROMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CROMF is a better buy in the long-term than CDHSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CROMF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CROMF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

CDHSF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CROMF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +1.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.74%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+1.39% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CROMF($1.83B) has a higher market cap than CDHSF($933M). CROMF has higher P/E ratio than CDHSF: CROMF (760.57) vs CDHSF (7.09). CROMF YTD gains are higher at: 17.135 vs. CDHSF (-19.424). CROMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 264M vs. CDHSF (211M). CDHSF has more cash in the bank: 72M vs. CROMF (0). CDHSF has less debt than CROMF: CDHSF (1.29B) vs CROMF (2.19B). CROMF has higher revenues than CDHSF: CROMF (444M) vs CDHSF (258M).
CDHSFCROMFCDHSF / CROMF
Capitalization933M1.83B51%
EBITDA211M264M80%
Gain YTD-19.42417.135-113%
P/E Ratio7.09760.571%
Revenue258M444M58%
Total Cash72M0-
Total Debt1.29B2.19B59%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CDHSF vs CROMF: Fundamental Ratings
CDHSF
CROMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3248
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10087
SMR RATING
1..100
9390
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7848
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
24
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a38

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CDHSF's Valuation (96) in the null industry is in the same range as CROMF (97). This means that CDHSF’s stock grew similarly to CROMF’s over the last 12 months.

CROMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as CDHSF (100). This means that CROMF’s stock grew similarly to CDHSF’s over the last 12 months.

CROMF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as CDHSF (93). This means that CROMF’s stock grew similarly to CDHSF’s over the last 12 months.

CROMF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as CDHSF (78). This means that CROMF’s stock grew similarly to CDHSF’s over the last 12 months.

CDHSF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as CROMF (4). This means that CDHSF’s stock grew similarly to CROMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CDHSFCROMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
38%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
5%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
34%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
5%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
32%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
26%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CROMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LCCCX30.44N/A
N/A
Columbia Contrarian Core C
VLPIX16.40N/A
N/A
Virtus Duff & Phelps Sel MLP & Engy I
HFYSX12.30N/A
N/A
Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val R4
IJEMX14.97N/A
N/A
VY® JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity I
TGSAX9.82N/A
N/A
Templeton Global Smaller Comp Adv

CDHSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDHSF has been loosely correlated with ATTRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CDHSF jumps, then ATTRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDHSF
1D Price
Change %
CDHSF100%
N/A
ATTRF - CDHSF
51%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CROMF - CDHSF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CCPPF - CDHSF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DBMBF - CDHSF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CDMGF - CDHSF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CROMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CROMF and RIOCF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CROMF and RIOCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CROMF
1D Price
Change %
CROMF100%
N/A
RIOCF - CROMF
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.33%
KMMPF - CROMF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
APYRF - CROMF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HRUFF - CROMF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MAA - CROMF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.84%
More