CDMGF
Price
$22.45
Change
-$1.55 (-6.46%)
Updated
Feb 20 closing price
Capitalization
3.1B
CPAMF
Price
$1.45
Change
-$0.01 (-0.68%)
Updated
Feb 24 closing price
Capitalization
10.19B
Ad is loading...

CDMGF vs CPAMF

Header iconCDMGF vs CPAMF Comparison
Open Charts CDMGF vs CPAMFBanner chart's image
Icade SA
Price$22.45
Change-$1.55 (-6.46%)
Volume$200
Capitalization3.1B
CAPITALAND INTEGRATED COML TR MGMT
Price$1.45
Change-$0.01 (-0.68%)
Volume$480
Capitalization10.19B
CDMGF vs CPAMF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CDMGF vs. CPAMF commentary
Feb 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDMGF is a Hold and CPAMF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 25, 2025
Stock price -- (CDMGF: $22.45 vs. CPAMF: $1.45)
Brand notoriety: CDMGF and CPAMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CDMGF: 156% vs. CPAMF: 13%
Market capitalization -- CDMGF: $3.1B vs. CPAMF: $10.19B
CDMGF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $3.1B. CPAMF’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $10.19B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CDMGF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCPAMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CDMGF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CPAMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CDMGF is a better buy in the long-term than CPAMF.

Price Growth

CDMGF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а -6.46% price change this week, while CPAMF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was -2.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -0.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.57%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-0.58% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CPAMF($10.2B) has a higher market cap than CDMGF($3.1B). CDMGF has higher P/E ratio than CPAMF: CDMGF (47.39) vs CPAMF (19.19). CPAMF YTD gains are higher at: 7.807 vs. CDMGF (0.990). CPAMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 966M vs. CDMGF (-260.3M). CDMGF has more cash in the bank: 697M vs. CPAMF (248M). CDMGF has less debt than CPAMF: CDMGF (5.46B) vs CPAMF (9.61B). CDMGF has higher revenues than CPAMF: CDMGF (1.82B) vs CPAMF (1.44B).
CDMGFCPAMFCDMGF / CPAMF
Capitalization3.1B10.2B30%
EBITDA-260.3M966M-27%
Gain YTD0.9907.80713%
P/E Ratio47.3919.19247%
Revenue1.82B1.44B126%
Total Cash697M248M281%
Total Debt5.46B9.61B57%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CDMGF vs CPAMF: Fundamental Ratings
CDMGF
CPAMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
922
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9397
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7954
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
258
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CDMGF's Valuation (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CPAMF (98). This means that CDMGF’s stock grew significantly faster than CPAMF’s over the last 12 months.

CDMGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CPAMF (100). This means that CDMGF’s stock grew similarly to CPAMF’s over the last 12 months.

CDMGF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as CPAMF (97). This means that CDMGF’s stock grew similarly to CPAMF’s over the last 12 months.

CPAMF's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as CDMGF (79). This means that CPAMF’s stock grew similarly to CDMGF’s over the last 12 months.

CDMGF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CPAMF (58). This means that CDMGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CPAMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AEMMX11.20N/A
N/A
American Century Emerging Markets A
SCVAX35.23N/A
N/A
Allspring Small Company Value A
PJRQX8.03N/A
N/A
PGIM Quant Solutions International Eq R6
TENWX11.52N/A
N/A
Nuveen Emerging Markets Eq Idx W
NSFHX12.53-0.02
-0.16%
Natixis Target Retirement 2040 N

CDMGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDMGF has been closely correlated with CHLWF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CDMGF jumps, then CHLWF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDMGF
1D Price
Change %
CDMGF100%
N/A
CHLWF - CDMGF
68%
Closely correlated
N/A
FREVS - CDMGF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
UTGPF - CDMGF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CPAMF - CDMGF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.68%
BYLOF - CDMGF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.30%
More

CPAMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CPAMF and FRZCF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CPAMF and FRZCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CPAMF
1D Price
Change %
CPAMF100%
-0.68%
FRZCF - CPAMF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PRKWF - CPAMF
24%
Poorly correlated
-3.30%
STKAF - CPAMF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.60%
SEGXF - CPAMF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.31%
MAPGF - CPAMF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More